Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Nov;9(9):1048-1056.
doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12135. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Over-the-scope clip versus transcatheter arterial embolization for refractory peptic ulcer bleeding-A propensity score matched analysis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Over-the-scope clip versus transcatheter arterial embolization for refractory peptic ulcer bleeding-A propensity score matched analysis

Armin Kuellmer et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or surgery are standard treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) refractory to endoscopic hemostasis. Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) have shown superiority to standard endoscopic treatment.

Objective: To compare OTSC treatment to TAE in refractory peptic ulcer bleeding.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, 128 patients treated with OTSC (n = 66) or TAE (n = 62) for refractory PUB between 2009 and 2019 in four academic centers were analyzed. Primary endpoint was clinical success (hemostasis + no rebleeding within 7 days). Secondary endpoints were adverse events, length of ICU stay, and mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

Results: Patients characteristics were similar in both groups but ulcers in the TAE group were larger, more often located in the duodenal bulb (85.5% vs. 65.2%; p = 0.014), and that the proportion of Forrest Ia bleedings was higher (38.7% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.018). Clinical success was comparable in both groups (74.2% vs. 59.7%; p = 0.092). Stay on the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly longer in the TAE group (mean 8.0 vs. 4.7 days; p = 0.002). Serious adverse events after re-therapy (12.9% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.042) and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher in the TAE group (9.1 vs. 22.6%, OR 2.92 [95% CI 1.04-8.16]; p = 0.05). After propensity score matching, the differences found regarding ICU stay (4.9± 5.9 and 9.2 ± 11.2; p = 0.009) and in-hospital mortality (5% vs. 22.5%; OR 5.52 [95% CI: 1.11-27.43]; p = 0.048) stayed significant.

Conclusions: OTSC treatment for refractory PUB was superior to TAE in terms of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality.

Keywords: over-the-scope clips; peptic ulcer hemorrhage; refractory upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage; transcatheter arterial embolization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Armin Kuellmer, Tobias Mangold, Dominik Bettinger, Lars Maruschke, Dominik Bettinger, Andreas Wannhoff, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Tobias Kleemann, Thomas Schulz, Carlo Jung, and Robert Thimme declare no conflict of interests. Karel Caca, Edris Wedi, and Arthur Schmidt have received lecture fees and study grants from Ovesco Endoscopy.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A flowchart of the study cohort is shown. Clinical success: successful hemostasis (no primary failure) AND the absence of a rebleeding within 7 days after intervention. Failure in the OTSC group: inability to stop the bleeding after placement of the OTSC, and/or if an OTSC could not be placed (after the endoscope was loaded with the clip). Failure of TAE: inability to stop a bleeding via embolization, and/or if a vessel could not be treated in angiography due to anatomical reasons (e.g., bleeding vessel too small for intubation). OTSC, over‐the‐scope clips; TAE, transcatheteral angiographic embolization

References

    1. Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:345–60. - PubMed
    1. Elmunzer BJ, Young SD, Inadomi JM, Schoenfeld P, Laine L. Systematic review of the predictors of recurrent hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostatic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2625–32. - PubMed
    1. Götz M, Anders M, Biecker E, Bojarski C, Braun G, Brechmann T, et al. S2k guideline gastrointestinal bleeding guideline of the German Society of Gastroenterology DGVS. Z Gastroenterol. 2017;55:883–936. - PubMed
    1. Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, Kurien M. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47:a1–a46. - PubMed
    1. Kyaw M, Tse Y, Ang D, Ang TL, Lau J. Embolization versus surgery for peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis: a meta‐analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2014;2:E6–E14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types