Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):542-551.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004547.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Pregnancy Outcomes in a U.S. Population

Affiliations

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Pregnancy Outcomes in a U.S. Population

Moeun Son et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic altered risk of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes and whether there were differences by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection status among pregnant women.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study using Epic's Cosmos research platform, women who delivered during the pandemic (March-December 2020) were compared with those who delivered prepandemic (matched months 2017-2019). Within the pandemic epoch, those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those with negative test results or no SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Comparisons were performed using standardized differences, with a value greater than 0.1 indicating meaningful differences between groups.

Results: Among 838,489 women (225,225 who delivered during the pandemic), baseline characteristics were similar between epochs. There were no significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes between epochs (standardized difference<0.10). In the pandemic epoch, 108,067 (48.0%) women had SARS-CoV-2 testing available; of those, 7,432 (6.9%) had positive test results. Compared with women classified as negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection, those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection were less likely to be non-Hispanic White or Asian or to reside in the Midwest and more likely to be Hispanic, have public insurance, be obese, and reside in the South or in high social vulnerability ZIP codes. There were no significant differences in the frequency of preterm birth (8.5% vs 7.6%, standardized difference=0.032), stillbirth (0.4% vs 0.4%, standardized difference=-0.002), small for gestational age (6.4% vs 6.5%, standardized difference=-0.002), large for gestational age (7.7% vs 7.7%, standardized difference=-0.001), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (16.3% vs 15.8%, standardized difference=0.014), placental abruption (0.5% vs 0.4%, standardized difference=0.007), cesarean birth (31.2% vs 29.4%, standardized difference=0.039), or postpartum hemorrhage (3.4% vs 3.1%, standardized difference=0.019) between those who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and those classified as testing negative.

Conclusion: In a geographically diverse U.S. cohort, the frequency of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes did not differ between those delivering before compared with during the pandemic, nor between those classified as positive compared with negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Eric Lindgren, Kieran Gallagher, and Justin Y. Lo disclosed that they are employees of Epic Systems Corporation, a health IT software company that provides Cosmos, a research platform containing data from Epic's health care provider customer organizations. Epic licenses electronic health record software and provides related services to health care organizations that pay Epic for such software and services. The authors and Epic and have no conflicts of interest with respect to the subject matter of this study but would like to clarify that insights gleaned from this research may inform Epic's software design and development activities. Heather H. Burris disclosed that money was paid to her institution from Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield Delaware's donor-advised fund (foundation grant), BluePrints for the Community, and Independence Blue Cross. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Study cohort identification flow diagram. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Son. COVID-19 Pandemic and Pregnancy Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Comment in

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID Data Tracker. Accessed July 5, 2021. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home
    1. Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KEN, Salah Z, Shakya I, Thierry JM, et al. . Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19-related concerns - United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1250–7. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, Collins SR. Covid-19 - implications for the health care system. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1483–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2021088 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T, Ugwumadu A, O'Brien P, Magee L. Change in the incidence of stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020;324:705–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12746 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hedermann G, Hedley PL, Bækvad-Hansen M, Hjalgrim H, Rostgaard K, Poorisrisak P, et al. . Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2021;106:93–5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319990 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types