An Efficacy Study between High Viscosity Glass Ionomers and Resin Sealants in Fissure Caries Prevention: A 2-Year Split Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 34433220
- PMCID: PMC8890911
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731925
An Efficacy Study between High Viscosity Glass Ionomers and Resin Sealants in Fissure Caries Prevention: A 2-Year Split Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objectives: This clinical trial compared the efficacy of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants against resin-based sealants in terms of their retention and fissure caries preventive benefits over a period of 24 months among a section of school children in the Southern Indian state of Telangana.
Materials and methods: A split mouth clinical trial employed 198 children, who received these sealants on their lower permanent first molars. Retention was assessed 6 monthly and caries annually STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi-square tests were utilized to analyze the retention rate and the incidence of dental caries between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis plotted the cumulative survival percentage of partially, and fully retained sealants and the survival of dentin carious free pits and fissures among both the groups. A linear binary logistical regression analysis calculated the odds ratio.
Results: A statistical significant difference was observed in the retention rate between these sealants at every follow-up stage. The cumulative survival percentage of ART and resin sealants was calculated to be 30.9 and 37.5% by the end of 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference with regard to the survival of dentin carious free pits and fissures. The odds ratio for this trial was 0.747 (95% confidence interval: 0.493-1.13) CONCLUSION: Resin sealants fared better than ART sealants in the field of retention. However, no significant differences were observed with regard to fissure caries prevention by the end of the study period.
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.
Figures




References
-
- Baelum V, van Palenstein Helderman W, Hugoson A, Yee R, Fejerskov O.A global perspective on changes in the burden of caries and periodontitis: implications for dentistry J Oral Rehabil 20073412872–906.discussion 940 - PubMed
-
- Sheiham A, Sabbah W. Using universal patterns of caries for planning and evaluating dental care. Caries Res. 2010;44(02):141–150. - PubMed
-
- Wright J T, Crall J J, Fontana M. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(08):672–6.82E14. - PubMed
-
- Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(03):CD001830. - PubMed
-
- Anusavice K J, Shen C, Rawls H R.Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences2012
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources