Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;30(1):22-36.
doi: 10.1177/10731911211038630. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

A Systematic Review of Parenting Scales Measurement Invariance/ Equivalence of by Race and Ethnicity: Recommendations for Inclusive Parenting Research

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Parenting Scales Measurement Invariance/ Equivalence of by Race and Ethnicity: Recommendations for Inclusive Parenting Research

Violeta J Rodriguez et al. Assessment. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

The limited inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities in the development and validation of parenting measures limits our understanding of whether parenting constructs are valid in racial and ethnic minorities. Tests of measurement invariance/equivalence (MI/E) of parenting measures can help evaluate the validity of parenting constructs among racial/ethnic minorities. This systematic review summarized studies on MI/E of parenting constructs by race/ethnicity and evaluated the strength of the evidence. A literature search was conducted using various databases and references to retrieve studies from the United States. Indeed, 10 studies were identified that tested for MI/E of eight parenting scales by race/ethnicity. Only one scale showed moderate evidence of MI/E, five showed weak evidence of MI/E, and two showed no evidence of MI/E. Most studies (80%) used factor analytic methods to test for MI/E, but only two studies (20%) examined all levels of invariance. These findings show that differences exist in how racial/ethnic minorities perceive parenting constructs. Further research is needed to develop more inclusive parenting measures, to protect against the ways in which biased measures may pathologize or misrepresent parenting practices among racial/ethnic minorities.

Keywords: item response theory; measure development; measurement invariance; parenting; psychometrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Flow Diagram

References

    1. Anderson CB, Hughes SO, Fisher JO, & Nicklas TA (2005). Cross-cultural equivalence of feeding beliefs and practices: The psychometric properties of the child feeding questionnaire among Blacks and Hispanics. Preventive medicine, 41(2), 521–531. - PubMed
    1. Arnold DS, O’leary SG, Wolff LS, & Acker MM (1993). The Parenting Scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 137–144.
    1. Ayón C, Williams LR, Marsiglia FF, Ayers S, & Kiehne E (2015). A latent profile analysis of Latino parenting: The infusion of cultural values on family conflict. Families in Society, 96(3), 203–210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bornstein MH, Jager J, & Putnick DL (2013). Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, 33(4), 357–370. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown TA (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.

Publication types