Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 15;91(10):888-897.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jul 3.

A Framework for Developing Translationally Relevant Animal Models of Stress-Induced Changes in Eating Behavior

Affiliations
Review

A Framework for Developing Translationally Relevant Animal Models of Stress-Induced Changes in Eating Behavior

Marie François et al. Biol Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Stress often affects eating behaviors, leading to increased eating in some individuals and decreased eating in others. Identifying physiological and psychological factors that determine the direction of eating responses to stress has been a major goal of epidemiological and clinical studies. However, challenges of standardizing the stress exposure in humans hinder efforts to uncover the underlying mechanisms. The issue of what determines the direction of stress-induced feeding responses has not been directly addressed in animal models, but assays that combine stress with a feeding-related task are commonly used as readouts of other behaviors, such as anxiety. Sex, estrous cyclicity, circadian cyclicity, caloric restriction, palatable diets, elevated body weight, and properties of the stressors similarly influence feeding behavior in humans and rodent models. Yet, most rodent studies do not use conditions that are most relevant for studying feeding behavior in humans. This review proposes a conceptual framework for incorporating these influences to develop reproducible and translationally relevant assays to study effects of stress on food intake. Such paradigms have the potential to uncover links between emotional eating and obesity as well as to the etiology of eating disorders.

Keywords: Anhedonia; Animal models; Eating disorders; Emotional eating; Novelty suppressed feeding; Stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Sex
Numbers of publications that used males exclusively, females exclusively, or incorporated both sexes by decade.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Circadian cyclicity
Percentage of assays that evaluated food intake in the active phase (13%), the inactive phase (82%) or comparing both (5%).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Prandial state
Percentage of assays evaluating the effects of stress on food intake after a fast (58%), food-deprivation (5%) or in the fed state (37%).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Social isolation
Percentage of assays evaluating the effects of stress on food intake in singly housed animals (63%), group-housed animals (30%) or comparing both (7%).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Recommendations to increase translatability of rodent studies of stress-related eating behaviors.

References

    1. Del Guidice M, Buck CL, Chaby LE, Gormally BM, Taff CC, Thawley CJ, et al. (2018): What is stress? A systems perspective. Integrative and Comparative Biolog. 58:1019–1032. - PubMed
    1. Sternson SM, Nicholas Betley J, Cao ZF (2013): Neural circuits and motivational processes for hunger. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 23:353–360. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nonacs P (2001): State dependent behavior and themarginal value theorem. Behav Ecol. 12:71–83.
    1. Stone AA, Brownell KD (1994): The stress-eating paradox: Multiple daily measurements in adult males and females. Psychology and Health. 9:425–436.
    1. Kandiah J, Yake M, Willett H (2008): Effects of stress on eating practices among adults. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 37:27–38.

Publication types