A Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- PMID: 34437329
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001560
A Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Abstract
Bleeding remains a major source of morbidity associated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Moreover, there remains significant controversy, and a paucity of data regarding the ideal anticoagulation strategy for VV-ECMO patients. All patients undergoing isolated, peripheral VV-ECMO between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients (n = 123) were stratified into one of three sequential eras of anticoagulation strategies: activated clotting time (ACT: 160-180 seconds, n = 53), high-partial thromboplastin time (H-PTT: 60-80 seconds, n = 25), and low-PTT (L-PTT: 45-55 seconds, n = 25) with high-flow (>4 L/min). Pre-ECMO APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, and Murray scores were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the L-PTT group required less red blood cell units on ECMO than the ACT or H-PTT group (2.1 vs. 1.3 vs. 0.9; p < 0.001) and patients in the H-PTT and L-PTT group required less fresh frozen plasma than the ACT group (0.33 vs. 0 vs. 0; p = 0.006). Overall, major bleeding events were significantly lower in the L-PTT group than in the ACT and H-PTT groups. There was no difference in thrombotic events. In this single-institution experience, a L-PTT, high-flow strategy on VV-ECMO was associated with fewer bleeding and no difference in thrombotic events than an ACT or H-PTT strategy.
Copyright © ASAIO 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. No funding was required for this study.
References
-
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al.; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group: Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA 315: 788–800, 2016.
-
- Parekh M, Abrams D, Brodie D: Extracorporeal techniques in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Transl Med 5: 296, 2017.
-
- Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H, et al.: The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 39: 1704–1713, 2013.
-
- Sukhal S, Sethi J, Ganesh M, Villablanca PA, Malhotra AK, Ramakrishna H: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe influenza infection with respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Card Anaesth 20: 14–21, 2017.
-
- Robba C, Ortu A, Bilotta F, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory distress syndrome in trauma patients: A case series and systematic literature review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 82: 165–173, 2017.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical