Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 23;13(8):586.
doi: 10.3390/toxins13080586.

Mycotoxin Biomarkers in Pigs-Current State of Knowledge and Analytics

Affiliations
Review

Mycotoxin Biomarkers in Pigs-Current State of Knowledge and Analytics

Agnieszka Tkaczyk et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Farm animals are frequently exposed to mycotoxins, which have many adverse effects on their health and become a significant food safety issue. Pigs are highly exposed and particularly susceptible to mycotoxins, which can cause many adverse effects. For the above reasons, an appropriate diagnostic tool is needed to monitor pig' exposure to mycotoxins. The most popular tool is feed analysis, which has some disadvantages, e.g., it does not include individual exposure. In recent years, the determination of biomarkers as a method to assess the exposure to mycotoxins by using concentrations of the parent compounds and/or metabolites in biological matrices is becoming more and more popular. This review provides a comprehensive overview of reported in vivo mycotoxin absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) and toxicokinetic studies on pigs. Biomarkers of exposure for aflatoxins, deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, T-2 toxin and zearalenone are described to select the most promising compound for analysis of porcine plasma, urine and faeces. Biomarkers occur in biological matrices at trace levels, so a very sensitive technique-tandem mass spectrometry-is commonly used for multiple biomarkers quantification. However, the sample preparation for multi-mycotoxin methods remains a challenge. Therefore, a summary of different biological samples preparation strategies is included in that paper.

Keywords: multi-mycotoxin LC-MS/MS method; mycotoxin biomarkers; pig health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation of ingested mycotoxin dose compared to the relevant urinary biomarker(s) excreted in 24 h post-dose for each mycotoxin/biomarker couple from studies in pigs (data from Table 2) (a) ZEN/ZEN, (b) ZEN/α-ZEL.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation of ingested mycotoxin dose compared to the relevant urinary biomarker(s) for each mycotoxin/biomarker couple from studies in pigs (data from Table 3). (a) DON/DON, (b) DON/DOM-1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation of ingested mycotoxin dose compared to the serum DON concentration—data from recent studies in pigs (Table 3).

References

    1. Neme K., Mohammed A. Mycotoxin occurrence in grains and the role of postharvest management as a mitigation strategies. A review. Food Control. 2017;78:412–425. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.012. - DOI
    1. Pinotti L., Ottoboni M., Giromini C., Dell’Orto V., Cheli F. Mycotoxin contamination in the EU feed supply chain: A focus on Cereal Byproducts. Toxins. 2016;8:45. doi: 10.3390/toxins8020045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives . Report on Meeting of Experts Committeed and Study Groups, Evalualtion of Certain Mycotoxins. Dec 23, 2020. Excecutive Board, EB148/47.
    1. Bryden W.L. Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;173:134–158. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.014. - DOI
    1. Zain M.E. Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2011;15:129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2010.06.006. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources