Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Aug 26;385(9):815-825.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100665.

Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Phe508del-Gating and -Residual Function Genotypes

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Phe508del-Gating and -Residual Function Genotypes

Peter J Barry et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is a small-molecule cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator regimen shown to be efficacious in patients with at least one Phe508del allele, which indicates that this combination can modulate a single Phe508del allele. In patients whose other CFTR allele contains a gating or residual function mutation that is already effectively treated with previous CFTR modulators (ivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor), the potential for additional benefit from restoring Phe508del CFTR protein function is unclear.

Methods: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with cystic fibrosis and Phe508del-gating or Phe508del-residual function genotypes. After a 4-week run-in period with ivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor, patients were randomly assigned to receive elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor or active control for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the absolute change in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline through week 8 in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group.

Results: After the run-in period, 132 patients received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and 126 received active control. Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor resulted in a percentage of predicted FEV1 that was higher by 3.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 4.6) relative to baseline and higher by 3.5 percentage points (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.7) relative to active control and a sweat chloride concentration that was lower by 22.3 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.2 to 24.5) relative to baseline and lower by 23.1 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.1 to 26.1) relative to active control (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The change from baseline in the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor was 10.3 points (95% CI, 8.0 to 12.7) and with active control was 1.6 points (95% CI, -0.8 to 4.1). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in one patient (elevated aminotransferase level) in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group and in two patients (anxiety or depression and pulmonary exacerbation) in the active control group.

Conclusions: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor was efficacious and safe in patients with Phe508del-gating or Phe508del-residual function genotypes and conferred additional benefit relative to previous CFTR modulators. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX18-445-104 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04058353.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Efficacy End Points.
Panel A shows the absolute change from baseline at each visit in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on the basis of a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Panel B shows the absolute change from baseline at each visit in the sweat chloride concentration on the basis of a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Panel C shows the absolute change from baseline at each visit in the score on the respiratory domain of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire–Revised (CFQ-R) on the basis of a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Respiratory domain scores are normalized to a 100-point range, with higher scores indicating a higher patient-reported quality of life with regard to respiratory symptoms; the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 4 points and is indicated in the plot by the straight gray line. In Panels A through C, data are least-squares means, and the I bars indicate standard errors; the dashed line at 0 cor responds to no change from baseline. The sample size shown under each x axis is the number of patients at that time point with data that could be evaluated. ELX–TEZ–IVA denotes elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor, IVA ivacaftor, and TEZ–IVA tezacaftor–ivacaftor.

Comment in

References

    1. Bell SC, Mall MA, Gutierrez H, et al. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:65–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Boeck K, Amaral MD. Progress in therapies for cystic fibrosis. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4:662–74. - PubMed
    1. Elborn JS. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet 2016; 388:2519–31. - PubMed
    1. Accurso FJ, Van Goor F, Zha J, et al. Sweat chloride as a biomarker of CFTR activity: proof of concept and ivacaftor clinical trial data. J Cyst Fibros 2014;13: 139–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cystic Fibrosis Mutation Database (CFTR1). 2011. (http://www.genet.sickkids.on.ca/ ).

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data