Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 26;8(8):635.
doi: 10.3390/children8080635.

Plate Fixation for Irreducible Proximal Humeral Fractures in Children and Adolescents-A Single-Center Case Series of Six Patients

Affiliations

Plate Fixation for Irreducible Proximal Humeral Fractures in Children and Adolescents-A Single-Center Case Series of Six Patients

Florian Freislederer et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Recommended treatment for severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in children is the closed reduction and percutaneous fixation by K-wires or intramedullary nailing.

Methods: From January 2016 to January 2017 6, 21 children/adolescents (range 8 to 16 years) with proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically for severe displacement. In these six patients, several attempts of closed reduction were unsuccessful, and an open reduction was performed. The humeral head was fixed with a 3.5 mm T-plate without affecting the growth plate. Plate removal was performed at a mean interval of 132 days after initial surgery. Two years after initial surgery, the clinical outcome was assessed by the Constant-Murley score and QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) and the shoulder joint was evaluated with a standardized sonographic examination for the rotator cuff and the conjoint tendon.

Results: In all six patients, dorsal displacement of the fracture was irreducible due to the interposition of tendinous or osseous structures. Intraoperatively, the interposed structures were the long biceps tendon in two, periosteal tissue in two, a bony fragment in one, and the long biceps tendon together with the conjoint tendon in one case. At mean follow-up of 26 months (range 22 months to 29 months), patients showed very good clinical results with an excellent mean Constant-Murley score of 97.5 (range 91 to 100) and mean QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) of 5.5 (range 0-20.8). An X-ray follow-up 6 weeks after surgery demonstrated early consolidation and correct alignment in all patients. A sonographic evaluation at 2 years post injury showed that the biceps and the conjoined tendon were intact in all patients.

Conclusions: If a proximal humeral fracture is not reducible by closed means, a tissue entrapment (most likely biceps tendon) should be considered. Treatment with an open reduction and plate fixation yields very good clinical and radiological results and preserves interposed structures as the biceps and conjoint tendon.

Keywords: ORIF; biceps; children; humerus fracture; plate fixation; proximal humeral fracture; tissue entrapment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radiographic shoulder views (Pat. N° 4) (ap/Neer). (A,B): Dorsally displaced humeral head. (C,D): 10 weeks after open reduction and plate fixation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chronologic radiographic images of Pat. N° 1. (A) Initial images after trauma with a posteriorly displaced proximal humeral fracture. (B) After closed reduction and transepiphyseal fixation. (C) X-ray 1 day after surgery shows posterior displacement in the Neer view (right side). (D) Open reduction and T-plate fixation. (E) X-ray follow-up 10 weeks after open reduction and plate-fixation with anatomical reduction and fracture healing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative findings. (A) Entrapment of the long biceps tendon (white arrow) in the fracture gap (Pat. N° 1, see also Figure 2); (B) freed long biceps tendon (Pat. N° 1, see also Figure 2); (C) freed conjoint tendons (white asterisk) (Pat. N° 4, see also Figure 1).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sonographic scans 2 years postoperatively of the soft tissue surrounding the shoulder joint.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Range of motion after plate fixation of a proximal humerus fracture on the right site (Patient N° 6).

References

    1. Landin L.A. Epidemiology of children’s fractures. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1997;6:79–83. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199704000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neer Fractures of the proximal humeral epiphyseal plate. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1965;41:24–31. - PubMed
    1. Shrader M.W. Proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures in children. Hand Clin. 2007;23:431–435. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lefevre Y., Journeau P., Angelliaume A., Bouty A., Dobremez E. Proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2014;100:S149–S156. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bishop J.Y., Flatow E.L. Pediatr. Shoulder Trauma. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005;432:41–48. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000156005.01503.43. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources