Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 5;13(16):3964.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13163964.

Different Approaches for Case-Mix Adjustment of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Compare Healthcare Providers-Methodological Results of a Systematic Review

Nora Tabea Sibert  1 , Holger Pfaff  2 , Clara Breidenbach  1 , Simone Wesselmann  1 , Christoph Kowalski  1
Affiliations
Review

Different Approaches for Case-Mix Adjustment of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Compare Healthcare Providers-Methodological Results of a Systematic Review

Nora Tabea Sibert et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly being used to compare the quality of outcomes between different healthcare providers (medical practices, hospitals, rehabilitation facilities). However, such comparisons can only be fair if differences in the case-mix between different types of provider are taken into account. This can be achieved with adequate statistical case-mix adjustment (CMA). To date, there is a lack of overview studies on current CMA methods for PROs. The aim of this study was to investigate which approaches are currently used to report and examine PROs for case-mix-adjusted comparison between providers. A systematic MEDLINE literature search was conducted (February 2021). The results were examined by two reviewers. Articles were included if they compared (a) different healthcare providers using (b) case-mix-adjusted (c) patient-reported outcomes (all AND conditions). From 640 hits obtained, 11 articles were included in the analysis. A wide variety of patient characteristics were used as adjustors, and baseline PRO scores and basic sociodemographic and clinical information were included in all models. Overall, the adjustment models used vary considerably. This evaluation is an initial attempt to systematically investigate different CMA approaches for PROs. As a standardized approach has not yet been established, we suggest creating a consensus-based methodological guideline for case-mix adjustment of PROs.

Keywords: case-mix adjustment; healthcare provider comparison; patient-reported outcomes; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart. PRO, patient-reported outcome; CMA, case-mix adjustment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Klinkhammer-Schalke M., Koller M., Steinger B., Ehret C., Ernst B., Wyatt J.C., Hofstadter F., Lorenz W., Regensburg Qo L.S.G. Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: Randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106:826–838. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klinkhammer-Schalke M., Steinger B., Koller M., Zeman F., Fürst A., Gumpp J., Obermaier R., Piso P., Lindberg-Scharf P., Altendorfer A., et al. Diagnosing deficits in quality of life and providing tailored therapeutic options: Results of a randomised trial in 220 patients with colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2020;130:102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fromme E.K., Eilers K.M., Mori M., Hsieh Y.C., Beer T.M. How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22:3485–3490. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laugsand E.A., Sprangers M.A., Bjordal K., Skorpen F., Kaasa S., Klepstad P. Health care providers underestimate symptom intensities of cancer patients: A multicenter European study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2010;8:104. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E., Deal A.M., Kris M.G., Scher H.I., Hudis C.A., Sabbatini P., Rogak L., Bennett A.V., Dueck A.C., Atkinson T.M., et al. Symptom Monitoring with Patient-Reported Outcomes during Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;34:557. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. - DOI - PMC - PubMed