Advocating for a New Residency Application Process: A Student Perspective
- PMID: 34446382
- PMCID: PMC8714002
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.07.018
Advocating for a New Residency Application Process: A Student Perspective
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Advocating for a New Residency Application Process: A Student Perspective". J Surg Educ. 2022 January-February; 79(1): 20-24.J Surg Educ. 2022 Jul-Aug;79(4):1082. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 May 18. J Surg Educ. 2022. PMID: 35597760 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for surgical residency programs to rethink their methods of evaluating and recruiting candidates. However, the past year has not been seamless, with a soaring number of applications, reports of programs and applicants having difficulty evaluating each other, and an increasingly uneven distribution of interviews among applicants. Consequently, many have called for national changes to the residency application process to address these longstanding concerns.
Results: Here, we review the evolving literature and advocate for the permanent adoption of visiting rotations, virtual interviews with a universal release date and data-driven attendance limits, and opportunities for in-person applicant visits.
Conclusions: We believe these changes leverage the strengths of each format, allow for satisfactory bidirectional evaluation, and promote principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.
Keywords: diversity; equity; inclusion; justice; residency match; virtual interviews.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.