Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 26;11(1):17256.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96806-6.

Central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference as a marker to identify fluid responsiveness in septic shock

Affiliations

Central venous-to-arterial PCO2 difference as a marker to identify fluid responsiveness in septic shock

Boulos Nassar et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Defining the hemodynamic response to volume therapy is integral to managing critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure, especially in the absence of cardiac index (CI) measurement. This study aimed at investigating whether changes in central venous-to-arterial CO2 difference (Δ-ΔPCO2) and central venous oxygen saturation (ΔScvO2) induced by volume expansion (VE) are reliable parameters to define fluid responsiveness in sedated and mechanically ventilated septic patients. We prospectively studied 49 critically ill septic patients in whom VE was indicated because of circulatory failure and clinical indices. CI, ΔPCO2, ScvO2, and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured before and after VE. Responders were defined as patients with a > 10% increase in CI (transpulmonary thermodilution) after VE. We calculated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for Δ-ΔPCO2, ΔScvO2, and changes in CI (ΔCI) after VE in the whole population and in the subgroup of patients with an increase in VO2 (ΔVO2) ≤ 10% after VE (oxygen-supply independency). Twenty-five patients were fluid responders. In the whole population, Δ-ΔPCO2 and ΔScvO2 were significantly correlated with ΔCI after VE (r = - 0.30, p = 0.03 and r = 0.42, p = 0.003, respectively). The AUCs for Δ-ΔPCO2 and ΔScvO2 to define fluid responsiveness (increase in CI > 10% after VE) were 0.76 (p < 0.001) and 0.68 (p = 0.02), respectively. In patients with ΔVO2 ≤ 10% (n = 36) after VE, the correlation between ΔScvO2 and ΔCI was 0.62 (p < 0.001), and between Δ-ΔPCO2 and ΔCI was - 0.47 (p = 0.004). The AUCs for Δ-ΔPCO2 and ΔScvO2 were 0.83 (p < 0.001) and 0.73 (p = 0.006), respectively. In these patients, Δ-ΔPCO2 ≤ -37.5% after VE allowed the categorization between responders and non-responders with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 60%. In sedated and mechanically ventilated septic patients with no signs of tissue hypoxia (oxygen-supply independency), Δ-ΔPCO2 is a reliable parameter to define fluid responsiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showing the ability of the changes in ΔPCO2 (Δ-ΔPCO2) (green curve), ScvO2 (ΔScvO2) (blue curve) between before and after 500 mL of volume expansion to define fluid responsiveness (increase in cardiac index > 10% after volume expansion).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showing the ability of the changes in ΔPCO2 (Δ-ΔPCO2) (green curve), ScvO2 (ΔScvO2) (blue curve) between before and after 500 mL of volume expansion to define fluid responsiveness (increase in cardiac index > 10% after volume expansion) in the subgroup of patients with an increase in oxygen consumption ≤ 10%.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showing the ability of baseline ΔPCO2/ΔContO2 (red curve), ScvO2 (yellow curve), and lactate (black curve) to predict an increase in oxygen consumption > 10% after 500 mL of volume expansion.

References

    1. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–2008. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit. Care Med. 2006;34:1333–1337. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2011;17:290–295. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834699cd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit. Care Med. 2006;34:1402–1407. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215453.11735.06. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit. Care Med. 2009;37:951–956. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1. - DOI - PubMed