Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 5;8(3):249-258.
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab059.

Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices)

Collaborators, Affiliations

Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices)

A G Fraser et al. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. .

Abstract

In the European Union (EU) the delivery of health services is a national responsibility but there are concerted actions between member states to protect public health. Approval of pharmaceutical products is the responsibility of the European Medicines Agency, whereas authorizing the placing on the market of medical devices is decentralized to independent 'conformity assessment' organizations called notified bodies. The first legal basis for an EU system of evaluating medical devices and approving their market access was the medical device directives, from the 1990s. Uncertainties about clinical evidence requirements, among other reasons, led to the EU Medical Device Regulation (2017/745) that has applied since May 2021. It provides general principles for clinical investigations but few methodological details-which challenges responsible authorities to set appropriate balances between regulation and innovation, pre- and post-market studies, and clinical trials and real-world evidence. Scientific experts should advise on methods and standards for assessing and approving new high-risk devices, and safety, efficacy, and transparency of evidence should be paramount. The European Commission recently awarded a Horizon 2020 grant to a consortium led by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, that will review methodologies of clinical investigations, advise on study designs, and develop recommendations for aggregating clinical data from registries and other real-world sources. The CORE-MD project (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices) will run until March 2024; here we describe how it may contribute to the development of regulatory science in Europe.

Keywords: Clinical investigations; Evidence-based practice; Medical devices; Registries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential contributions of CORE-MD across the lifecycle of medical device development and evaluation. CORE-MD, Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices. The central horizontal panel illustrates the standard sequence for evaluating the evidence for a high-risk medical device in the EU. It does not show all the responsibilities of notified bodies. Figure adapted from Fraser et al. The green boxes correspond to specific tasks in CORE-MD. DG SANTE, Directorate General for Health; CEAR, Clinical evaluation assessment report; CE = Conformité Européenne.

References

    1. European Union . Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2017.11....
    1. Fraser AG, Butchart EG, Szymański P, Caiani EG, Crosby S, Kearney P et al. The need for transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe. Lancet 2018;392:521‒530. - PubMed
    1. Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment on the Revision of the Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices, accompanying the documents Proposals for Regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council on medical devices, and amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and on in vitro diagnostic medical devices. SWD/2012/0273 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52012SC0273 (16 June 2021).
    1. Hwang TJ, Sokolov E, Franklin JM, Kesselheim AS. Comparison of rates of safety issues and reporting of trial outcomes for medical devices approved in the European Union and United States: cohort study. BMJ 2016;353:i3323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Commission . SC1-HCO-18-2020: developing methodological approaches for improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/op... (17 May 2021).

Publication types