Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;45(12):3695-3706.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06296-w. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery

Miriam Lillo-Felipe  1 , Rebecka Ahl Hulme  2   3   4 , Maximilian Peter Forssten  1   3 , Gary A Bass  3   5 , Yang Cao  6 , Peter Matthiessen  1 , Shahin Mohseni  7   8
Affiliations

Center-Level Procedure Volume Does Not Predict Failure-to-Rescue After Severe Complications of Oncologic Colon and Rectal Surgery

Miriam Lillo-Felipe et al. World J Surg. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcome after colorectal cancer surgery has thoroughly been studied. However, few studies have assessed hospital surgical volume and failure-to-rescue (FTR) after colon and rectal cancer surgery. The aim of the current study is to evaluate FTR following colorectal cancer surgery between clinics based on procedure volume.

Methods: Patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Sweden from January 2015 to January 2020 were recruited through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as the proportion of patients with 30-day mortality after severe postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Severe postoperative complications were defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3. FTR incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated comparing center volume stratified in low-volume (≤ 200 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 200 cases/year), as well as with an alternative stratification comparing low-volume (< 50 cases/year), medium-volume (50-150 cases/year) and high-volume centers (> 150 cases/year).

Results: A total of 23,351 patients were included in this study, of whom 2964 suffered severe postoperative complication(s). Adjusted IRR showed no significant differences between high- and low-volume centers with an IRR of 0.97 (0.75-1.26, p = 0.844) in high-volume centers in the first stratification and an IRR of 2.06 (0.80-5.31, p = 0.134) for high-volume centers and 2.15 (0.83-5.56, p = 0.116) for medium-volume centers in the second stratification.

Conclusion: This nationwide retrospectively analyzed cohort study fails to demonstrate a significant association between hospital surgical volume and FTR after colorectal cancer surgery. Future studies should explore alternative characteristics and their correlation with FTR to identify possible interventions for the improvement of quality of care after colorectal cancer surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mortality rate (%) among patients with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) per colorectal unit according to their average yearly procedure volume
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH. Workload and surgeon´s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005391.pub3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–1137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138:721. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.7.721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20):1747–1751. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.20.1747. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aquina CT, Probst CP, Becerra AZ, et al. High volume improves outcomes: the argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Surgery. 2016;159:736–748. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.021. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources