Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec:153:106777.
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106777. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Cost-effectiveness of stop smoking incentives for medicaid-enrolled pregnant women

Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness of stop smoking incentives for medicaid-enrolled pregnant women

Marlon P Mundt et al. Prev Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Maternal smoking increases mortality and morbidity risks for both mother and infant. The First Breath Wisconsin study examined the cost-effectiveness of providing incentives to pregnant women who smoked to engage in stop smoking treatment. Participants (N = 1014) were Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women recruited from September 2012 to April 2015 through public health departments, private, and community health clinics in Wisconsin. The incentive group (n = 505) could receive $460 for completing pre-birth visits ($25 each), post-birth home visits ($40, $25, $25, $40 for 1-week, 2-month, 4-month and 6-month visits), monthly smoking cessation phone calls post-birth ($20 each), and biochemically-verified tobacco abstinence at 1-week ($40) and 6-months ($40) post-birth. The control group (n = 509) received up to $80 for 1-week ($40) and 6-month ($40) post-birth assessments. Intervention costs included incentive payments to participants, counselor and administrative staff time, and smoking cessation medications. Cost-effectiveness analysis calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per one additional smoker who quit. The incentive group had higher 6-month post-birth biochemically-confirmed tobacco abstinence than the control group (14.7% vs. 9.2%). Incremental costs averaged $184 per participant for the incentive group compared to controls ($317 vs $133). The ICER of financial incentives was $3399 (95% CI $2228 to $8509) per additional woman who was tobacco abstinent at 6 months post-birth. The ICER was lower ($2518 vs $4760) for women who did not live with another smoker. This study shows use of financial incentives for stop smoking treatment is a cost-effective option for low-income pregnant women who smoke.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Cost-effectiveness; Medicaid; Smoking and tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
Consort Diagram of First Breath Wisconsin Randomized Controlled Trial
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Cost-effectiveness decision tree for incentiving First Breath engagement based on number of post-partum home visits and post-partum phone consults completed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayadi MF, Adams EK, Melvin CL, Rivera CC, Gaffney CA, Pike J, … Ferguson JN (2006). Costs of a smoking cessation counseling intervention for pregnant women: comparison of three settings. Public Health Rep, 121(2), 120–126. doi:10.1177/003335490612100204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker TB, Fraser DL, Kobinsky K, Adsit R, Smith SS, Khalil L, … Fiore MC (2018). A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives to low income pregnant women to engage in smoking cessation treatment: Effects on post-birth abstinence. J Consult Clin Psychol, 86(5), 464–473. doi:10.1037/ccp0000278 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker H, & Jaddoe VW (2011). Cardiovascular and metabolic influences of fetal smoke exposure. Eur J Epidemiol, 26(10), 763–770. doi:10.1007/s10654-011-9621-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd KA, Briggs AH, Bauld L, Sinclair L, & Tappin D (2016). Are financial incentives cost-effective to support smoking cessation during pregnancy? Addiction, 111(2), 360–370. doi:10.1111/add.13160 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briggs AH, Mooney CZ, & Wonderling DE (1999). Constructing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: an evaluation of parametric and non-parametric techniques using Monte Carlo simulation. Stat Med, 18(23), 3245–3262. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10602149 - PubMed

Publication types