Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 19;21(16):5597.
doi: 10.3390/s21165597.

Distinguishing Drones from Birds in a UAV Searching Laser Scanner Based on Echo Depolarization Measurement

Affiliations

Distinguishing Drones from Birds in a UAV Searching Laser Scanner Based on Echo Depolarization Measurement

Jacek Wojtanowski et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Widespread availability of drones is associated with many new fascinating possibilities, which were reserved in the past for few. Unfortunately, this technology also has many negative consequences related to illegal activities (surveillance, smuggling). For this reason, particularly sensitive areas should be equipped with sensors capable of detecting the presence of even miniature drones from as far away as possible. A few techniques currently exist in this field; however, all have significant drawbacks. This study addresses a novel approach for small (<5 kg) drones detection technique based on a laser scanning and a method to discriminate UAVs from birds. The latter challenge is fundamental in minimizing the false alarm rate in each drone monitoring equipment. The paper describes the developed sensor and its performance in terms of drone vs. bird discrimination. The idea is based on simple cross-polarization ratio analysis of the optical echo received as a result of laser backscattering on the detected object. The obtained experimental results show that the proposed method does not always guarantee 100 percent discrimination efficiency, but provides certain confidence level distribution. Nevertheless, due to the hardware simplicity, this approach seems to be a valuable addition to the developed anti-drone laser scanner.

Keywords: UAV detection; anti-drone system; drone detection; drone monitoring; drone vs. bird discrimination; laser scanner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Heuristic presentation of a reflection of light from rough surface, as a combination of several physical mechanisms. Visualization of magnified rough surface micro-relief and six possible examples of how a ray of light can interact with it.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Laboratory setup for experimental search of optimum output/measured polarizations combination in terms of feathers vs. artificial surfaces discrimination.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Optical configuration of the developed scanner (rotating mirror omitted).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Photography of the constructed anti-drone laser scanner prototype.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Samples representing birds.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Samples representing drones.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Photo of the experimental test site.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Results of cross-polarization ratio field measurements using the developed laser scanner module. Samples naming corresponds to Figure 5 and Figure 6 (red color—drones; green color—birds).
Figure 9
Figure 9
(Left) histograms of separated data sets corresponding to drones (in red) and birds (in green). (Right) normal distributions (normalized to unity) fitted to both histograms.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Probability density functions of δ (drones curve—in red, birds curve—in green).
Figure 11
Figure 11
Drones vs. birds classification probability factor.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Comparison of the measured δ obtained for various distances (right) with two Gaussian curves corresponding to drones (red) and feathers (green) obtained in the static measurements (left). Db, Ds, Df – symbols associated with the specific drones models used in the experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhi Y., Fu Z., Sun X., Yu J. Security and Privacy Issues of UAV: A Survey. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2020;25:95–101. doi: 10.1007/s11036-018-1193-x. - DOI
    1. Khan N.A., Brohi S.N., Jhanjhi N. UAV’s Applications, Architecture, Security Issues and Attack Scenarios: A Survey. In: Peng S.L., Son L., Suseendran G., Balaganesh D., editors. Intelligent Computing and Innovation on Data Science. Springer; Singapore: 2020. pp. 753–760. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. - DOI
    1. Al-Dhaqm A., Ikuesan R.A., Kebande V.R., Razak S., Ghabban F.M. Research Challenges and Opportunities in Drone Forensics Models. Electronics. 2021;10:1519. doi: 10.3390/electronics10131519. - DOI
    1. Statement on the Security Threat Posed by Unmanned Aerial Systems and Possible Countermeasures. [(accessed on 7 July 2021)];2015 Available online: https://radionavlab.ae.utexas.edu/images/stories/files/papers/statement-....
    1. The Guardian Gatwick Drone Disruption Cost Airport Just £1.4m. [(accessed on 5 July 2021)]; Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jun/18/gatwick-drone-disruption....

LinkOut - more resources