The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm-A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial
- PMID: 34451352
- PMCID: PMC8400102
- DOI: 10.3390/polym13162814
The Influence of Modified Experimental Dental Resin Composites on the Initial In Situ Biofilm-A Triple-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Split-Mouth Trial
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the bacterial viability of the initial biofilm on the surface of experimental modified dental resin composites. Twenty-five healthy individuals with good oral hygiene were included in this study. In a split-mouth design, they received acrylic splints with five experimental composite resin specimens. Four of them were modified with either a novel polymeric hollow-bead delivery system or methacrylated polymerizable Irgasan (Antibacterial B), while one specimen served as an unmodified control (ST). A delivery system based on Poly-Pore® was loaded with one of the active agents: Tego® Protect 5000 (Antiadhesive A), Dimethicone (Antiadhesive B), or Irgasan (Antibacterial A). All study subjects refrained from toothbrushing during the study period. Specimens were detached from the splints after 8 h and given a live/dead staining before fluorescence microscopy. A Friedman test and a post hoc Nemenyi test were applied with a significance level at p < 0.05. In summary, all materials but Antibacterial B showed a significant antibacterial effect compared to ST. The results suggested the role of the materials' chemistry in the dominance of cell adhesion. In conclusion, dental resin composites with Poly-Pore-loaded active agents showed antibacterial effectiveness in situ.
Keywords: Poly-Pore; antiadhesive composites; antibacterial composites; bacterial viability; clinical trial; live/dead staining; split-mouth.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The effect of new anti-adhesive and antibacterial dental resin filling materials on gingival fibroblasts.Dent Mater. 2021 Sep;37(9):1416-1424. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jul 10. Dent Mater. 2021. PMID: 34253351
-
Bacterial viability and physical properties of antibacterially modified experimental dental resin composites.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 1;8(11):e79119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079119. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24223890 Free PMC article.
-
Bacterial viability on surface-modified resin-based dental restorative materials.Arch Oral Biol. 2012 Nov;57(11):1512-21. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 4. Arch Oral Biol. 2012. PMID: 22673754
-
Surface properties of resin-based composite materials and biofilm formation: A review of the current literature.Am J Dent. 2015 Dec;28(6):311-20. Am J Dent. 2015. PMID: 26846036 Review.
-
Biochemical Stability and Interactions of Dental Resin Composites and Adhesives with Host and Bacteria in the Oral Cavity: A Review.J Can Dent Assoc. 2018 Jan;84:i1. J Can Dent Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29513214 Review.
Cited by
-
Utilization of a 3D Printed Orthodontic Distalizer for Tooth-Borne Hybrid Treatment in Class II Unilateral Malocclusions.Materials (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;15(5):1740. doi: 10.3390/ma15051740. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35268969 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mjor I.A., Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: A literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000;31:165–179. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources