Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 17;10(8):1040.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10081040.

Optimization of DNA Extraction from Field-Collected Mammalian Whole Blood on Filter Paper for Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas Disease) Detection

Bonnie E Gulas-Wroblewski  1   2 , Rebecca B Kairis  1   3   4 , Rodion Gorchakov  1   5 , Anna Wheless  1   6 , Kristy O Murray  1   3
Affiliations

Optimization of DNA Extraction from Field-Collected Mammalian Whole Blood on Filter Paper for Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas Disease) Detection

Bonnie E Gulas-Wroblewski et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

Blood filter paper strips are cost-effective materials used to store body fluid specimens under challenging field conditions, extending the reach of zoonotic pathogen surveillance and research. We describe an optimized procedure for the extraction of parasite DNA from whole blood (WB) stored on Type I Advantec Nobuto strips from both experimentally spiked and field-collected specimens from canine and skunks, respectively. When comparing two commercial kits for extraction, Qiagen's DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit performed best for the detection of parasite DNA by PCR from Trypanosoma cruzi-spiked canine WB samples on Nobuto strips. To further optimize recovery of β-actin from field-collected skunk WB archived on Nobuto strips, we modified the extraction procedures for the Qiagen kit with a 90 °C incubation step and extended incubation post-addition of proteinase K, a method subsequently employed to identify a T. cruzi infection in one of the skunks. Using this optimized extraction method can efficaciously increase the accuracy and precision of future molecular epidemiologic investigations targeting neglected tropical diseases in field-collected WB specimens on filter strips.

Keywords: Chagas disease; DNA extraction; Nobuto strip; PCR; Trypanosoma cruzi; blood filter paper; mammalian surveillance; neglected tropical diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trypanosoma cruzi DNA recovery from spiked canine whole blood specimens. Bars indicate one standard deviation. As detailed in the text for use with Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit: QIA A = extraction optimization method A; QIA B = extraction optimization method B. ZR Pathogen = Zymo Research Quick-DNA/RNA Pathogen Miniprep; ZR Duet = Zymo Research ZR-Duet DNA/RNA Miniprep Plus kit. Cq = quantification cycle; Nobuto = whole blood samples processed from Nobuto blood filter papers; Blood = whole blood samples processed directly; MED = medium spiking load; HI = high spiking load.
Figure 2
Figure 2
β-actin DNA recovered from skunk whole blood archived on Nobuto blood filter paper strips. DNA extracted according to protocols outlined in the text for Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit: Method A = extraction optimization method A; Method B = extraction optimization method B; Method C = extraction optimization method C. Cq = quantification cycle.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bern C., Messenger L.A., Whitman J.D., Maguire J.H. Chagas Disease in the United States: A Public Health Approach. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019;33:e00023-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00023-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis), Fact Sheet No. 340. [(accessed on 19 November 2020)];2020 Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chagas-disease-(amer...
    1. Hanford E.J., Zhan F.B., Lu Y., Giordano A. Chagas disease in Texas: Recognizing the significance and implications of evidence in the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007;65:60–79. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarkar S., Strutz S.E., Frank D.M., Rivaldi C.L., Sissel B., Sánchez-Cordero V. Chagas disease risk in Texas. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010;4:e836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000836. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hotez P.J., Bottazzi M.E., Dumonteil E., Valenzuela J.G., Kamhawi S., Ortega J., Rosales S.P.D.L., Cravioto M.B., Tapia-Conyer R. Texas and Mexico: Sharing a Legacy of Poverty and Neglected Tropical Diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012;6:e1497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001497. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources