Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 13;10(8):1667.
doi: 10.3390/plants10081667.

Will Plant Genome Editing Play a Decisive Role in "Quantum-Leap" Improvements in Crop Yield to Feed an Increasing Global Human Population?

Affiliations
Review

Will Plant Genome Editing Play a Decisive Role in "Quantum-Leap" Improvements in Crop Yield to Feed an Increasing Global Human Population?

Anton V Buzdin et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Growing scientific evidence demonstrates unprecedented planetary-scale human impacts on the Earth's system with a predicted threat to the existence of the terrestrial biosphere due to population increase, resource depletion, and pollution. Food systems account for 21-34% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Over the past half-century, water and land-use changes have significantly impacted ecosystems, biogeochemical cycles, biodiversity, and climate. At the same time, food production is falling behind consumption, and global grain reserves are shrinking. Some predictions suggest that crop yields must approximately double by 2050 to adequately feed an increasing global population without a large expansion of crop area. To achieve this, "quantum-leap" improvements in crop cultivar productivity are needed within very narrow planetary boundaries of permissible environmental perturbations. Strategies for such a "quantum-leap" include mutation breeding and genetic engineering of known crop genome sequences. Synthetic biology makes it possible to synthesize DNA fragments of any desired sequence, and modern bioinformatics tools may hopefully provide an efficient way to identify targets for directed modification of selected genes responsible for known important agronomic traits. CRISPR/Cas9 is a new technology for incorporating seamless directed modifications into genomes; it is being widely investigated for its potential to enhance the efficiency of crop production. We consider the optimism associated with the new genetic technologies in terms of the complexity of most agronomic traits, especially crop yield potential (Yp) limits. We also discuss the possible directions of overcoming these limits and alternative ways of providing humanity with food without transgressing planetary boundaries. In conclusion, we support the long-debated idea that new technologies are unlikely to provide a rapidly growing population with significantly increased crop yield. Instead, we suggest that delicately balanced humane measures to limit its growth and the amount of food consumed per capita are highly desirable for the foreseeable future.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; crop yield potential (Yp) limits; quantum leap; synthetic biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Genome-editing schemes with site-specific DNA nucleases. Double-stranded breaks (DSBs) induced by a nuclease (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9) at a specific site can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed recombination (HDR). (A) Repair by NHEJ usually results in the insertion or deletion of random base pairs causing gene knockout. (B) HDR with a donor DNA template with homologous arms can be exploited to achieve gene insertion and deletion, (C) to modify a gene by introducing precise nucleotide substitutions, and (D) inserting a correct gene copy instead of the mutant gene. DSB = double-stranded break.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Base editing illustrated with cytidine deamination. In this type of base editing, cytidine deaminase fused with dCas9 targets the desired location. There is no DSB; C is converted directly into U on the free strand; and during mismatch repair, a C → T substitution can be created when the modified strand is used as a template [15].

Similar articles

  • The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ, Raps H, Cropper M, Bald C, Brunner M, Canonizado EM, Charles D, Chiles TC, Donohue MJ, Enck J, Fenichel P, Fleming LE, Ferrier-Pages C, Fordham R, Gozt A, Griffin C, Hahn ME, Haryanto B, Hixson R, Ianelli H, James BD, Kumar P, Laborde A, Law KL, Martin K, Mu J, Mulders Y, Mustapha A, Niu J, Pahl S, Park Y, Pedrotti ML, Pitt JA, Ruchirawat M, Seewoo BJ, Spring M, Stegeman JJ, Suk W, Symeonides C, Takada H, Thompson RC, Vicini A, Wang Z, Whitman E, Wirth D, Wolff M, Yousuf AK, Dunlop S. Landrigan PJ, et al. Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023. Ann Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 36969097 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Enhancement of Plant Productivity in the Post-Genomics Era.
    Thao NP, Tran LS. Thao NP, et al. Curr Genomics. 2016 Aug;17(4):295-6. doi: 10.2174/138920291704160607182507. Curr Genomics. 2016. PMID: 27499678 Free PMC article.
  • Next-Generation Breeding Strategies for Climate-Ready Crops.
    Razzaq A, Kaur P, Akhter N, Wani SH, Saleem F. Razzaq A, et al. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 21;12:620420. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.620420. eCollection 2021. Front Plant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34367194 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas technology for accelerated crop improvement.
    Das D, Singha DL, Paswan RR, Chowdhury N, Sharma M, Reddy PS, Chikkaputtaiah C. Das D, et al. Planta. 2022 Apr 23;255(5):109. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03894-3. Planta. 2022. PMID: 35460444 Review.
  • Advances in Crop Breeding Through Precision Genome Editing.
    Nerkar G, Devarumath S, Purankar M, Kumar A, Valarmathi R, Devarumath R, Appunu C. Nerkar G, et al. Front Genet. 2022 Jul 14;13:880195. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.880195. eCollection 2022. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35910205 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Tortell P.D. Earth 2020: Science, society, and sustainability in the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:8683–8691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001919117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harte J. In: Patient Earth. Socolow R.H., editor. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; New York, NY, USA: 1971.
    1. Meadows D., Meadows D., Randers J., Behrens W.W., III. The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books New York; New York, NY, USA: 1972.
    1. Tollefson J. The hard truths of climate change—By the numbers. Nature. 2019;573:324–327. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02711-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) Temperature Change and Carbon Dioxide Change. [(accessed on 12 February 2018)]; Available online: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/global-warming/temperature-change.

LinkOut - more resources