Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 6;13(8):1212.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081212.

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), a New Chapter in the Production of Solid Oral Forms (SOFs) by 3D Printing

Affiliations
Review

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS), a New Chapter in the Production of Solid Oral Forms (SOFs) by 3D Printing

Yanis A Gueche et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

3D printing is a new emerging technology in the pharmaceutical manufacturing landscape. Its potential advantages for personalized medicine have been widely explored and commented on in the literature over recent years. More recently, the selective laser sintering (SLS) technique has been investigated for oral drug-delivery applications. Thus, this article reviews the work that has been conducted on SLS 3D printing for the preparation of solid oral forms (SOFs) from 2017 to 2020 and discusses the opportunities and challenges for this state-of-the-art technology in precision medicine. Overall, the 14 research articles reviewed report the use of SLS printers equipped with a blue diode laser (445-450 nm). The review highlights that the printability of pharmaceutical materials, although an important aspect for understanding the sintering process has only been properly explored in one article. The modulation of the porosity of printed materials appears to be the most interesting outcome of this technology for pharmaceutical applications. Generally, SLS shows great potential to improve compliance within fragile populations. The inclusion of "Quality by Design" tools in studies could facilitate the deployment of SLS in clinical practice, particularly where Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) for 3D-printing processes do not currently exist. Nevertheless, drug stability and powder recycling remain particularly challenging in SLS. These hurdles could be overcome by collaboration between pharmaceutical industries and compounding pharmacies.

Keywords: 3D printing; orally disintegrating forms; personalized medicine; printability; selective laser sintering; solid oral forms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of the SLS printer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Main critical properties for the printability of polymeric powders in SLS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Different designs of dosage forms produced by SLS: (a) cylindrical [27,29,30,31,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], (b) torus [31], (c) gyroid lattice [30], (d) bilayer cylindrical and gyroid [30], (e) miniprintlet [32], (f) dual miniprintlet [32], (g) cylindrical with Braille A [36], (h) cylindrical with Moon A [36], (i) sun with Moon M [36], (j) moon with Moon N [36], (k) heart with Moon C [36], (l) pentagon with Braille M [36].
Figure 4
Figure 4
SEM images of vertical sections: (A) dense printlet, (B) porous printlet [78]. Reproduced with permission from the authors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relationship between laser scanning speed, porosity of the printlets and disintegration.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Applications of SOFs printed by SLS in personalized medicine.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Collaboration of Pharmaceutical industries and compounding Pharmacies for the preparation of solid oral forms by SLS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kochanowska-Karamyan A.J. Pharmaceutical Compounding: The Oldest, Most Symbolic, and Still Vital Part of Pharmacy. Int. J. Pharm. Compd. 2016;20:367–374. - PubMed
    1. Govender R., Abrahmsén-Alami S., Larsson A., Folestad S. Therapy for the Individual: Towards Patient Integration into the Manufacturing and Provision of Pharmaceuticals. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2020;149:58–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nielsen L.E., Forrester J.B., Girotto J.E., Dassner A.M., Humphries R. One Size Fits All? Application of Susceptible-Dose-Dependent Breakpoints to Pediatric Patients and Laboratory Reporting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019;58 doi: 10.1128/JCM.01446-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McLean A.J., Le Couteur D.G. Aging Biology and Geriatric Clinical Pharmacology. Pharm. Rev. 2004;56:163–184. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.2.4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolea-Alamanac B., Bailey S.J., Lovick T.A., Scheele D., Valentino R. Female Psychopharmacology Matters! Towards a Sex-Specific Psychopharmacology. J. Psychopharmacol. (Oxf.) 2018;32:125–133. doi: 10.1177/0269881117747578. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources