Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 11;13(8):1239.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081239.

Development, Characterization, and In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Aptamer (Anti-MUC1/Y) for Breast Cancer Therapy

Affiliations

Development, Characterization, and In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Aptamer (Anti-MUC1/Y) for Breast Cancer Therapy

Huma Khan et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

MUC1, the transmembrane glycoprotein Mucin 1, is usually found to be overexpressed in a variety of epithelial cancers playing an important role in disease progression. MUC1 isoforms such as MUC1/Y, which lacks the entire variable number of tandem repeat region, are involved in oncogenic processes by enhancing tumour initiation. MUC1/Y is therefore considered a promising target for the identification and treatment of epithelial cancers; but so far, the precise role of MUC1/Y remains to be elucidated. In this work, we developed and identified a DNA aptamer that specifically recognizes the splice variant MUC1/Y for the first time. The DNA aptamer could bind to a wide variety of human cancer cells, and treatment of MUC1/Y positive cells resulted in reduced growth in vitro. Moreover, MUC1/Y aptamer inhibited the tumour growth of breast cancer cells in vivo. The present study highlights the importance of targeting MUC1/Y for cancer treatment and unravels the suitability of a DNA aptamer to act as a new therapeutic tool.

Keywords: MUC1/Y; aptamer; cancer; pharmacokinetics; therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest concerning this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The three selected aptamers, (A) S11, (B) S51, and (C) S75 in three presentations: entire aptamer (left), variable region (middle), and structured region (right). All dG values are expressed in Kcal/mol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluorescence changes observed upon titration of the 20mer into the S11 aptamer-dye complex. (A) Emission spectra; (B) Fluorescence changes plot as a function of 20mer concentration. All experiments were performed in duplicate and the results presented are the average of these measurements; (C) Dissociation constants obtained from the Ru (II) complex displacement assay. Data for the aptamer-dye complex were all fit to a sigmoidal function while data for the aptamer-peptide complex best fit to differing functions: MM = standard hyperbolic function described by the Michaelis–Menten equation; SF = sigmoidal fit; and QD = quadratic function for binding.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Thermal denaturation of S11a. (A) Fluorescence melting profiles of S11a alone at 3 TDC; (B) Fluorescence melting profiles of S11a with the 20mer peptide at 3 TDC.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Thermal denaturation of (A) S11a, (B) S11b, and (C) S11c. Comparison of the fluorescence melting profiles of S11a, S11b and S11c with the 10mer and 20mer peptides.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(AC) Percentage of positive events of MUC1/Y in SK-OV-3, A498, HT-29, DU145, A549, PC-3, Calu-6, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and OVCAR-3 using the aptamers (A) S11a, (B) S11b, and (C) S11c. (D) Representative immunofluorescence of MCF-7, DU145, Calu-6, and A498 cells stained with control-Cy3 (aptamer SP68; selected against a different/non-MUC1 tumour marker peptide), S11a-Cy3 or S11b-Cy3, * p < 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Radiochemical purity of S11b-99mTc aptamer at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h post-labelling in saline. (B) Tumour growth curve of MDA-MB-231 tumour-bearing NOD-scid mice control (red) and treated with 100 mg/Kg of S11b aptamer (green). Data are the mean (S.D.), n = 5. Data were analysed by a non-linear regression model. **** p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duraisamy S., Ramasamy S., Kharbanda S., Kufe D. Distinct evolution of the human carcinoma-associated transmembrane mucins, MUC1, MUC4 AND MUC16. Gene. 2006;373:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.12.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agrawal B., Gendler S.J., Longenecker B.M. The biological role of mucins in cellular interactions and immune regulation: Prospects for cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Med. Today. 1998;4:397–403. doi: 10.1016/S1357-4310(98)01322-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burdick M.D., Harris A., Reid C.J., Iwamura T., Hollingsworth M.A. Oligosaccharides expressed on MUC1 produced by pancreatic and colon tumor cell lines. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:24198–24202. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.39.24198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Obermair A., Schmid B.C., Packer L.M., Leodolter S., Birner P., Ward B.G., Crandon A.J., McGuckin M.A., Zeillinger R. Expression of MUC1 splice variants in benign and malignant ovarian tumours. Int. J. Cancer. 2002;100:166–171. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cascio S., Zhang L., Finn O.J. MUC1 Protein Expression in Tumor Cells Regulates Transcription of Proinflammatory Cytokines by Forming a Complex with Nuclear Factor-κB p65 and Binding to Cytokine Promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:42248–42256. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.297630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed