Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 18;13(8):1630.
doi: 10.3390/v13081630.

Exacerbation of Influenza A Virus Disease Severity by Respiratory Syncytial Virus Co-Infection in a Mouse Model

Affiliations

Exacerbation of Influenza A Virus Disease Severity by Respiratory Syncytial Virus Co-Infection in a Mouse Model

Junu A George et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

Influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are leading causes of childhood infections. RSV and influenza are competitive in vitro. In this study, the in vivo effects of RSV and IAV co-infection were investigated. Mice were intranasally inoculated with RSV, with IAV, or with both viruses (RSV+IAV and IAV+RSV) administered sequentially, 24 h apart. On days 3 and 7 post-infection, lung tissues were processed for viral loads and immune cell populations. Lung functions were also evaluated. Mortality was observed only in the IAV+RSV group (50% of mice did not survive beyond 7 days). On day 3, the viral loads in single-infected and co-infected mice were not significantly different. However, on day 7, the IAV titer was much higher in the IAV+RSV group, and the RSV viral load was reduced. CD4 T cells were reduced in all groups on day 7 except in single-infected mice. CD8 T cells were higher in all experimental groups except the RSV-alone group. Increased airway resistance and reduced thoracic compliance were demonstrated in both co-infected groups. This model indicates that, among all the infection types we studied, infection with IAV followed by RSV is associated with the highest IAV viral loads and the most morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: IAV; RSV; co-infection; mortality; viral titer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic representation of the experimental strategy for the RSV and IAV co-infection model. Mice were intranasally infected with RSV A2, IAV PR8 or both, one after the other, after a 24 h interval (RSV+IAV or IAV+RSV). One group of mice was intranasally inoculated with PBS and served as the control group. All groups were monitored for up to 7 days (daily weight and survival); on selected days post-infection (d3 and d7), mice were sacrificed for experimental analyses that included organ (lung, spleen and thymus) weights, viral titers, immunophenotyping and lung function.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Body weight loss was more severe in mice infected with IAV 24 h prior to RSV inoculation. Mice were infected with IAV PR8, RSV A2 or one after the other, 24 h apart (IAV+RSV and RSV+IAV) and monitored for (A) survival and (B) body weight changes for 7 days. Mice inoculated with PBS served as the control. Values are mean ± SEM (in percentages) of the daily weight divided by the starting weight for each mouse. Survival data were derived from two independent experiments (n = 6 mice per group). Body weight data were derived from five independent experiments (n = 18 mice per group). Asterisks denote significant differences between the control and experimental groups; (** p < 0.005). Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan–Meier survival curves and a log-rank test, using GraphPad Prism.
Figure 3
Figure 3
IAV and RSV lung viral loads in co-infection mouse model. On day 3 or 7 post-infection, mRNA was extracted from lungs and processed for real time PCR analysis of (A) IAV and (B) RSV genes. Results represent mean pooled values +/− SEM from three independent experiments, (n = 5–9 mice per group). Asterisks denote significant differences between experimental groups; * p < 0.05; ns = not significant. Comparison among groups was performed using the nonparametric test (2 independent variables: Mann–Whitney).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Co-infection leads to significant atrophy of the spleen and thymus, and an increase in lung weight. On day 3 or 7 post-infection, mice were sacrificed, and lung (A,D), spleen (B,E) and thymus (C,F) were excised and weighed. Results represent mean pooled values +/− SEM from three independent experiments. Asterisks denote significant differences among the control, co-infected and singly-infected groups; (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005); ns = not significant. Comparison among groups was performed using the nonparametric test (two independent variables: Mann–Whitney).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effects of co-infection on immune-cell populations in the lungs. On day 7 post-infection, mice were sacrificed, and lung immune cells were stained with anti-CD4 (A), anti-CD8 (B), anti-CD19 (C) and anti-CD11B (D) antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. Results represent mean pooled values +/− SEM from two independent experiments. Asterisks denote significant differences among the control, co-infected and singly-infected groups (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0005); ns = not significant. Comparison among groups was performed using the nonparametric test (two independent variables: Mann–Whitney).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lung function assessment on day 3 post-infection. Upper panels: Baseline airway reactivity expressed as thoracic resistance (Rrs), thoracic compliance (Crs) and large airway resistance (Rn). Lower panels: Methacholine responsiveness shown as “area under the curve” (AUC) of Rrs, Crs and Rn against methacholine concentration. The values are mean ± SEM. Two separate experiments (n = 6) were performed. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences between experimental groups and the control group (* p < 0.05, ** p  <  0.005, *** p < 0.0005). Two separate experiments (n = 6) were performed; ns = not significant. Comparison among groups was performed using the nonparametric test (two independent variables: Mann–Whitney).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:1191–1210. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30310-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberle J.H., Aberle S.W., Pracher E., Hutter H.P., Kundi M., Popow-Kraupp T. Single versus dual respiratory virus infections in hospitalized infants: Impact on clinical course of disease and interferon-γ response. Pediatric Infect. Dis. J. 2005;24:605–610. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000168741.59747.2d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee H.J., Seo Y.E., Han S.B., Jeong D.C., Kang J.H. Clinical Impact of Mixed Respiratory Viral Infection in Children with Adenoviral Infection. Infect. Chemother. 2016;48:309–316. doi: 10.3947/ic.2016.48.4.309. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DaPalma T., Doonan B.P., Trager N.M., Kasman L.M. A systematic approach to virus–virus interactions. Virus Res. 2010;149:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.01.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opatowski L., Baguelin M., Eggo R.M. Influenza interaction with cocirculating pathogens and its impact on surveillance, pathogenesis, and epidemic profile: A key role for mathematical modelling. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006770. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006770. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms