Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 27;21(1):315.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01460-9.

Provider perspectives on the provision of safe, equitable, trauma-informed care for intimate partner violence survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Emma E Williams #  1 , Kaetlyn R Arant #  1 , Valia P Leifer #  1 , Mardi Chadwick Balcom  2   3 , Nomi C Levy-Carrick  4   5 , Annie Lewis-O'Connor  6   7 , Jeffrey N Katz  8   9   10   11
Affiliations

Provider perspectives on the provision of safe, equitable, trauma-informed care for intimate partner violence survivors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Emma E Williams et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Early research suggests the COVID-19 pandemic worsened intimate partner violence (IPV) in the US. In particular, stay-at-home orders and social distancing kept survivors in close proximity to their abusers and restricted access to resources and care. We aimed to understand and characterize the impact of the pandemic on delivery of IPV care in Boston.

Methods: We conducted individual interviews with providers of IPV care and support in the Greater Boston area, including healthcare workers, social workers, lawyers, advocates, and housing specialists, who continued to work during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using thematic analysis, we identified themes describing the challenges and opportunites providers faced in caring for survivors during the pandemic.

Results: Analysis of 18 interviews yielded four thematic domains, encompassing 18 themes and nine sub-themes. Thematic analysis revealed that the pandemic posed an increased threat to survivors of IPV by exacerbating external stressors and leading to heightened violence. On a system level, the pandemic led to widespread uncertainty, strained resources, amplified inequities, and loss of community. On an individual level, COVID-19 restrictions limited survivors' abilities to access resources and to be safe, and amplified pre-existing inequities, such as limited technology access. Those who did not speak English or were immigrants experienced even more difficulty accessing resources due to language and/or cultural barriers. To address these challenges, providers utilized video and telephone interactions, and stressed the importance of creativity and cooperation across different sectors of care.

Conclusions: While virtual care was essential in allowing providers to care for survivors, and also allowed for increased flexibility, it was not a panacea. Many survivors faced additional obstacles to care, such as language barriers, unequal access to technology, lack of childcare, and economic insecurity. Providers addressed these barriers by tailoring services and care modalities to an individual's needs and circumstances. Going forward, some innovations of the pandemic period, such as virtual interactions and cooperation across care sectors, may be utilized in ways that attend to shifting survivor needs and access, thereby improving safe, equitable, and trauma-informed IPV care.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Care delivery; Domestic violence; Health systems; Intimate partner violence; Qualitative; Telehealth; Trauma-informed care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JNK reports being on the Board of FINEX House, a women’s shelter in the Boston area. The rest of the authors declare to have no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Thematic map
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Smith S, Zhang X, Basile K, Merrick M, Wang J, Kresnow M-J, et al. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 Data Brief—Updated release Atlanta Georgia National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention November 2018.
    1. Hamby S, Finkelhor D, Turner H, Ormrod R. Children's exposure to intimate partner violence and other family violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin: U.S. Department of Justice; 2011.
    1. Hsu L-C, Henke A. COVID-19, staying at home, and domestic violence. Rev Econ Household. 2021;19(1):145–155. doi: 10.1007/s11150-020-09526-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ertan D, El-Hage W, Thierrée S, Javelot H, Hingray C. COVID-19: urgency for distancing from domestic violence. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020;11(1):1800245. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1800245. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viero A, Barbara G, Montisci M, Kustermann K, Cattaneo C. Violence against women in the Covid-19 pandemic: a review of the literature and a call for shared strategies to tackle health and social emergencies. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;319:110650. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110650. - DOI - PMC - PubMed