Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e051830.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051830.

Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review protocol

Affiliations

Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review protocol

Samantha Sii et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Amblyopia is an important public health concern associated with functional vision loss and detrimental impact on the physical and mental well-being of children. The gold standard for diagnosis of amblyogenic conditions currently involves screening by orthoptists and/or ophthalmologists. The bloom of technology enables the use of home-based screening tools to detect these conditions at an early stage by the layperson in community, which could reduce the burden of screening in the community, especially during restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we propose a systematic review aiming to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of home-based screening tools compared with the existing gold standard.

Methods and analysis: We aim to search for studies involving home-based screening tools for amblyopia among children aged under 18 years. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Level 4 evidence and above will be included, without language or time restrictions. The following platforms will be searched from inception to 31 August 2021: PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and Clinicaltrials.gov. Two independent reviewers will identify studies for inclusion based on a screening questionnaire. The search and screening will start on 14 August 2021 until 1 October 2021. We aim to complete our data analysis by 30 November 2021. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool for diagnostic accuracy studies only. Our primary outcome measure is the diagnostic accuracy of home-based screening tools, while secondary outcome measures include validity, feasibility, reproducibility and cost-effectiveness, where available.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not necessary as no primary data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through presentations at scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journal publication.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021233511.

Keywords: community child health; information technology; paediatric ophthalmology; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Powell C, Hatt SR. Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;8:CD005020. 10.1002/14651858.CD005020.pub3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2128–34. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group . Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1229–36. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levi DM. Progress and paradigm shifts in spatial vision over the 20 years of ECVP. Perception 1999;28:1443–59. 10.1068/p2819 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahi J, Logan S, Timms C, et al. Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study. Lancet 2002;360:597–602. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09782-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types