Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Aug 27;11(8):e052598.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052598.

Home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home-based rehabilitation programme compared with traditional physiotherapy for patients at risk of poor outcome after knee arthroplasty: the CORKA randomised controlled trial

Karen L Barker et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether a home-based rehabilitation programme for people assessed as being at risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty offers superior outcomes to traditional outpatient physiotherapy.

Design: A prospective, single-blind, two-arm randomised controlled superiority trial.

Setting: 14 National Health Service physiotherapy departments in the UK.

Participants: 621 participants identified at high risk of a poor outcome after knee arthroplasty using a bespoke screening tool.

Interventions: A multicomponent home-based rehabilitation programme delivered by rehabilitation assistants with supervision from qualified therapists versus usual care outpatient physiotherapy.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were the Oxford Knee Score (a disease-specific measure of function), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subscale, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, 5 dimension, 5 level version of Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) and physical function assessed using the Figure of 8 Walk test, 30 s Chair Stand Test and Single Leg Stance.

Results: 621 participants were randomised between March 2015 and January 2018. 309 were assigned to CORKA (Community Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty) home-based rehabilitation, receiving a median five treatment sessions (IQR 4-7). 312 were assigned to usual care, receiving a median 4 sessions (IQR 2-6). The primary outcome, LLFDI function total score at 12 months, was collected for 279 participants (89%) in the home-based CORKA group and 287 participants (92%) in the usual care group. No clinically or statistically significant difference was found between the groups (intention-to-treat adjusted difference=0.49 points; 95% CI -0.89 to 1.88; p=0.48). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on any of the patient-reported or physical secondary outcome measures at 6 or 12 months.There were 18 participants in the intervention group reporting a serious adverse event (5.8%), only one directly related to the intervention, all other adverse events recorded throughout the trial related to underlying chronic medical conditions.

Conclusions: The CORKA intervention was not superior to usual care. The trial detected no significant differences, clinical or statistical, between the two groups on either primary or secondary outcomes. CORKA offers an evaluation of an intervention utilising a different service delivery model for this patient group.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN13517704.

Keywords: Knee; Rehabilitation medicine; adult orthopaedics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: GC is a member of the HTA Commissioning Board. A Price has a consultancy with Zimmer Biomet, outside the submitted work. MU has grants from NIHR, during the conduct of the study; grants from NIHR, Personal fees from NIHR, Personal fees from NICE, non financial support from Stryker PLC, grants from SERCO. SL has grants from NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme during the conduct of the study and is a member of the following Boards: HTA Additional Capacity Funding Board 2010-2015, HTA Clinical Trials Board 2010-2015, HTA End of Life Care and Add on Studies 2015-2015, HTA Funding Boards Policy Group (Formally CSG) 2010–2015, HTA MNCH Methods Group 2013–2015, HTA Post-board funding teleconference (PG members to attend) 2010–2015, HTA Primary Care Themed Call board 2013–2014, HTA Prioritisation Group 2014–2015, NIHR CTU Standing Advisory Committee 2012–2016.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow chart. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The LLFDI function score from baseline to 12 months postrandomisation for each treatment group. LLFDI, Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.

References

    1. National Joint Registry for England, Wales NI and the I of M . 15th annual report, 2018. Available: www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NJR-15th-Annual-Report-2018
    1. Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DWC, et al. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:71–86. 10.1016/j.rdc.2006.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naylor J, Harmer A, Fransen M, et al. Status of physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee replacement in Australia. Physiother Res Int 2006;11:35–47. 10.1002/pri.40 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Westby MD, Kennedy D, Jones D, et al. Post-acute physiotherapy for primary total knee arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;86-A. 10.1002/14651858.CD007099 - DOI
    1. Moffet H, Collet J-P, Shapiro SH, et al. Effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation on functional ability and quality of life after first total knee arthroplasty: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:546–56. 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.080 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types