Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;23(11):1422-1432.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.07.026. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

Molecular Testing in Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Molecular Testing in Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions

Lulu Sun et al. J Mol Diagn. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Molecular testing in breast cancer is a rapidly developing field that is becoming increasingly integral to patient care. This article provides an overview of currently available molecular assays and testing modalities that have prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic value. These include multigene assays for invasive breast cancer (Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna, and Breast Cancer Index) and ductal carcinoma in situ (Oncotype DX DCIS and DCISionRT) and companion tests to detect PIK3CA mutations and NTRK fusions. The various assays related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, consisting of immunohistochemistry with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibodies SP142 and 22C3 and detection of microsatellite instability, mismatch repair deficiency, and tumor mutational burden are also discussed. Finally, the practical utility and hopeful promise of next-generation sequencing panels and circulating tumor (cell-free) DNA assays are evaluated. This review should serve as a useful and practical reference for practicing pathologists, molecular pathologists, clinicians, and researchers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Horowitz K., McGuire W. Predicting response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer: a hypothesis. Science. 1975;189:726–727. - PubMed
    1. Quirke V.M. Tamoxifen from failed contraceptive pill to best-selling breast cancer medicine: a case-study in pharmaceutical innovation. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:620. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sørlie T., Perou C.M., Tibshirani R., Aas T., Geisler S., Johnsen H., Hastie T., Eisen M.B., Van De Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., Thorsen T., Quist H., Matese J.C., Brown P.O., Botstein D., Lønning P.E., Børresen-Dale A.L. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:10869–10874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perou C.M., Sørile T., Eisen M.B., Van De Rijn M., Jeffrey S.S., Ress C.A., Pollack J.R., Ross D.T., Johnsen H., Akslen L.A., Fluge Ø., Pergammenschlkov A., Williams C., Zhu S.X., Lønning P.E., Børresen-Dale A.L., Brown P.O., Botstein D. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752. - PubMed
    1. Hagemann I.S. Molecular testing in breast cancer: a guide to current practices. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:815–824. - PubMed

MeSH terms