Do optional implants improve the femoral fit during total knee arthroplasty in Asians? Comparison of the femoral fit between single- and dual-option implants

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the femoral fit in Asian patients during total knee arthroplasty by examining whether (1) the advanced single-option implant improves the fit of the femoral component in both the anterior flange and distal cutting surface and (2) the dual-option implants show better fit than the advanced single-option implant.

Methods: A total of 950 knees that underwent primary total knee arthroplasty were included. Two types of single-option implant systems (Optetrak Logic and Truliant) and three types of dual-option implant systems (Anthem, Attune, and Persona) were used. The difference between the resected surface of the femur and femoral component dimensions was analyzed in predefined six zones. Appropriateness of fit (good-fit, over-hang, under-hang) was also evaluated.

Results: The advanced single-option implant showed higher rates of good-fit and lower rates of over-hang and under-hang in almost all distinct zones than the old version single-option implant. The advanced single-option implant demonstrated similar good-fit, higher over-hang and lower under-hang rates than the dual-option implants. All single-option implants showed significantly higher over-hang rate (P < 0.05) and lower under-hang rate (P < 0.05) than all dual-option implant systems in the anterior flange transverse area. The narrow option was only selected in 12-20% of all cases.

Conclusions: The advanced single-option implant system improved the fit of the femoral component when compared with the old version and showed similar good-fit rates when compared with the dual-option implant systems. The narrow option of the dual-option implant systems was used less frequently than expected in Asian knees.

Keywords: Asian; Fitting; Knee; Optional implant; Total knee arthroplasty.