Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Peshawar
- PMID: 34455727
- DOI: 10.1515/dx-2021-0078
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay to RT-PCR assay for laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in Peshawar
Abstract
Objectives: Antigen based rapid diagnostic tests possesses a potential to be utilized along with Gold standard methods to detect Covid-19 infection to cope with the demand of testing. The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic accuracy of electrochemiluminescence based automated antigen detection immunoassay comparing with molecular based test RT-PCR (Covid-19).
Methods: It was a cross-sectional study conducted in RMI Peshawar, from 1st April 2021 till 30th April 2021. The study comprised 170 individuals who were suspected of having Covid-19. Nasopharyngeal samples taken from suspected individuals were analyzed by RT-PCR and automated antigen test (Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen) simultaneously. The correlation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen with PCR positive and negative cases was analyzed for specificity, sensitivity respectively.
Results: The ECLIA based Elecsys antigen test (Roche) revealed overall sensitivity 72%, specificity 95% and accuracy of 94.9%. Sensitivity of antigen test progressively declined from 94.3% in Ct <25 to 70.8% in Ct 26-29 and then to 47.2% in Ct 30-35.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of our study we conclude that automated antigen testing (Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen) cannot replace molecular based testing like RT PCR. Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Ag test should be used complementary to RT-PCR in testing algorithms. Frequent testing strategy should be adopted while using automated antigen testing to overcome its limitation in individuals with low viral loads.
Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2 antigen; electrochemiluminescence immunoassay; rapid diagnostic testing.
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Similar articles
-
Clinical performance of the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen fully automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.Pract Lab Med. 2022 Mar;29:e00265. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2022.e00265. Epub 2022 Jan 15. Pract Lab Med. 2022. PMID: 35071720 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic performance of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay in the clinical routine of a tertiary care hospital: Preliminary results from a single-center evaluation.J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Aug;35(8):e23906. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23906. Epub 2021 Jul 12. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021. PMID: 34251047 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of a novel antigen detection test with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Infection. 2023 Feb;51(1):91-96. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01832-9. Epub 2022 May 5. Infection. 2023. PMID: 35513690 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;11:CD013639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013639.pub3. PMID: 32997361 Updated.
-
Combined Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2: Rapid Antigen Detection as an Adjunct to Nucleic Acid Detection.Lab Med. 2023 Mar 7;54(2):e37-e43. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmac089. Lab Med. 2023. PMID: 35895307 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical accuracy of instrument-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen diagnostic tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Virol J. 2024 Apr 29;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02371-5. Virol J. 2024. PMID: 38685117 Free PMC article.
-
Performance evaluation of STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag home test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 during early symptom onset.J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Jun;36(6):e24410. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24410. Epub 2022 Apr 20. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022. PMID: 35441745 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Automated SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Assay in Nasal Swab during COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;11(11):2110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11112110. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34829457 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and molecular fingerprint of SARS-CoV-2 among hospital employees in a period of Omicron BA.2 dominance.GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2025 Feb 24;20:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000531. eCollection 2025. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2025. PMID: 40352653 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
-
- Saeed, U, Uppal, SR, Piracha, ZZ, Rasheed, A, Aftab, Z, Zaheer, H, et al.. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-based rapid diagnostic kits in Pakistan: formulation of COVID-19 national testing strategy. Virol J 2021;18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-021-01505-3.
-
- Merino, P, Guinea, J, Muñoz-Gallego, I, González-Donapetry, P, Galán, JC, Antona, N, et al.. Multicenter evaluation of the PanbioTM COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.001 [Epub ahead of print].
-
- Perchetti, GA, Huang, M-L, Mills, MG, Jerome, KR, Greninger, AL. Analytical sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag CARD. J Clin Microbiol 2021;59. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02880-20.
-
- Fenollar, F, Bouam, A, Ballouche, M, Fuster, L, Prudent, E, Colson, P, et al.. Evaluation of the Panbio Covid-19 rapid antigen detection test device for the screening of patients with Covid-19. J Clin Microbiol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02589-20.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous