Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;31(4):371-388.
doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.05.001.

Advances in Imaging for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Applications to Radiation Oncology

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Imaging for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer: Applications to Radiation Oncology

Travis C Salzillo et al. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

While there has been an overall decline of tobacco and alcohol-related head and neck cancer in recent decades, there has been an increased incidence of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Recent research studies and clinical trials have revealed that the cancer biology and clinical progression of HPV-positive OPC is unique relative to its HPV-negative counterparts. HPV-positive OPC is associated with higher rates of disease control following definitive treatment when compared to HPV-negative OPC. Thus, these conditions should be considered unique diseases with regards to treatment strategies and survival. In order to sufficiently characterize HPV-positive OPC and guide treatment strategies, there has been a considerable effort to diagnose, prognose, and track the treatment response of HPV-associated OPC through advanced imaging research. Furthermore, HPV-positive OPC patients are prime candidates for radiation de-escalation protocols, which will ideally reduce toxicities associated with radiation therapy and has prompted additional imaging research to detect radiation-induced changes in organs at risk. This manuscript reviews the various imaging modalities and current strategies for tackling these challenges as well as provides commentary on the potential successes and suggested improvements for the optimal treatment of these tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Representative examples of radiographic features that have been useful for characterizing HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPC and associated lymph nodes. All images are T2-weighted MRI except for panels G and H which are CT. Reproduced with permission from Head Neck, 39: 1524–1534. (2017). © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Contrast-enhanced CT images of various nodal imaging features that are commonly associated with extranodal extension. Reproduced with permission from Laryngoscope, 130: 1479–1486 (2019). © 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Representative case of HPV-positive OPC patient who underwent imaging pre-treatment (top row) and mid-treatment at 3 weeks (bottom row) and showed complete response following chemoradiation. The tumor is imaged with T2-weighted MRI (a,e) and DWI MRI (b,f). The DWI parameter maps ADC (c,g) and D (d,h) are also displayed. Reproduced from J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 45: 1013–1023 (2017). (Open Access)
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
FDG PET/CT images of OPC patients who experienced complete response (A,B) and non-response (C,D) from induction chemotherapy at Day 14. The responding patient also displayed complete metabolic response through the reductions in primary tumor SUV (5.3 to 0.0) and lymph node SUV (5.1 to 0.0). The non-responding patient displayed reductions in primary tumor SUV but increases in lymph node SUV (2.8 to 3.6). Reproduced from PLOS ONE, 13: e0200823 (2018). (Open Access).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Incorporation of multiparametric imaging to identify changes associated with osteoradionecrosis. Reproduced with permission from Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., 108: 1319–1328 (2020). © 2020 Elsevier Inc.

References

    1. Deschuymer S, Mehanna H, and Nuyts S, “Toxicity Reduction in the Treatment of HPV Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: Emerging Combined Modality Approaches,” Front. Oncol, vol. 8, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfister DG et al., “Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology,” J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 873–898, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seiwert TY et al., “OPTIMA: a phase II dose and volume de-escalation trial for human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer,” Ann. Oncol, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 297–302, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy522. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen AM et al., “Reduced-dose radiotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: a single-arm, phase 2 study,” Lancet Oncol, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 803–811, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30246-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NRG Oncology, “Reduced-dose Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer.” https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02254278.

Publication types

MeSH terms