A Meta-Analysis Assessing Change in Pupillary Diameter, Accommodative Amplitude, and Efficacy of Atropine for Myopia Control
- PMID: 34456234
- DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000414
A Meta-Analysis Assessing Change in Pupillary Diameter, Accommodative Amplitude, and Efficacy of Atropine for Myopia Control
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effect of atropine on pupillary diameter, accommodative amplitude as well as myopia progression.
Methods: Medical databases and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies from 1980 until June 2020. The primary and secondary outcomes were: a) change in pupillary diameter (PD) and accommodative amplitude (AA) and b) annualized mean change in spherical equivalent and axial length with various concentrations of atropine compared to control.
Results: Thirteen trials (6 RCTs, 7 observational studies) that studied 9 atropine concentrations (0.01-1.0%) were included. The relation between atropine and change in PD and AA was nonlinear; at < 0.10% atropine, the slope of the curve was steep but the change in PD (+0.7 mm; 95% CI: +0.1 to +1.4) and AA (-1.6D; 95% CI: -3.9 to +0.7) was smaller whereas at ≥0.10% atropine, the slope plateaued but change in PD (+3.2 mm, 95% CI: +2.8 to +3.5) and AA (-10.7D; 95% CI: -12.2 to -9.2) was high.Reduction in myopia progression with atropine at <0.10% and ≥0.10% as compared to controls was 0.37D (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.58) versus 0.75D (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.33) for spherical equivalent and -0.10 mm (95% CI: -0.24 to 0.05) versus -0.23 mm (95% CI: -0.34 to -0.13) for axial length.
Conclusions: A nonlinear dose-response relationship exists between atropine and PD and AA. Further work is warranted to determine the concentration that provides maximal efficacy with tolerable side effects.
Copyright © 2021 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5:e1221–e1234.
-
- Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016; 123:1036–1042.
-
- Smith TS, Frick KD, Holden BA, et al. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87:431–437.
-
- Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:1354–1362. e1.
-
- Hsu WM, Cheng CY, Liu JH, et al. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2004; 111 (1):62–69.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
