Training for users of myoelectric multigrip hand prostheses: a scoping review
- PMID: 34456321
- DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000037
Training for users of myoelectric multigrip hand prostheses: a scoping review
Abstract
Background: Training is crucial to develop the ability to operate a myoelectric prosthetic hand and use it in daily life. Multigrip prostheses, with their wider repertoire of functions, require further training. Because studies show that prosthesis abandonment is an issue and the advanced functions are not used to the expected extent, the question of what training should be offered to patients arises. If the available training methods were synthesized, the training could be improved to the benefit of the people who are fitted with a multigrip prosthesis.
Objective: To critically examine the content of published sources for training of users with myoelectric multigrip hand prostheses.
Study design: Scoping review.
Methods: A literature search covering the period 2007-2020 in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, as well as gray literature from prosthesis manufacturers, identified 2,005 sources. After full-text review of 88 articles and four user manuals from manufacturers, nine sources were included and analyzed in their entirety.
Results: We found few descriptions of multigrip prosthesis training, and no source described all training phases in detail. Integration of the prosthesis and training in daily activities was described least. Few sources actually described how to perform training in multigrip functions, and none described how to integrate these functions in daily life.
Conclusions: Existing training instructions for using multigrip prosthetic hands are inadequate, providing poor guidance to clinicians and insufficient training for patients. Further research is needed into the efficiency of various training methods.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer incorporated on behalf of The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.
Similar articles
-
Effect of multi-grip myoelectric prosthetic hands on daily activities, pain-related disability and prosthesis use compared with single-grip myoelectric prostheses: A single-case study.J Rehabil Med. 2022 Jan 3;54:jrm00245. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v53.807. J Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 34766184 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term results of early myoelectric prosthesis fittings: A prospective case-control study.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Oct;42(5):527-533. doi: 10.1177/0309364617729922. Epub 2017 Sep 14. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018. PMID: 28905686
-
Training prosthesis users to switch between modes of a multi-articulating prosthetic hand.Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jan;46(1):187-198. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2157055. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Disabil Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 36541182
-
Passive prosthetic hands and tools: A literature review.Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Feb;42(1):66-74. doi: 10.1177/0309364617691622. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018. PMID: 28190380 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A scoping review of eye tracking metrics used to assess visuomotor behaviours of upper limb prosthesis users.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Apr 24;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01180-1. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 37095489 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effects of game design characteristics of a virtual reality serious game for upper-limb prosthesis control training on motor learning.Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Jun 17;6:1520184. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1520184. eCollection 2025. Front Rehabil Sci. 2025. PMID: 40600166 Free PMC article.
-
Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses.Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Dec;45(25):4311-4321. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2151653. Epub 2022 Dec 19. Disabil Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36533430 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing effectiveness of serious game training designed to assist in upper limb prosthesis rehabilitation.Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 29;5:1353077. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1353077. eCollection 2024. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024. PMID: 38348457 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland 2001.
-
- Postema SG, Bongers RM, Brouwers MA, et al. Musculoskeletal complaints in transverse upper limb reduction deficiency and amputation in the Netherlands: prevalence, predictors, and effect on health. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: 1137–1145.
-
- Vujaklija I, Farina D, Aszmann OC. New developments in prosthetic arm systems. Orthop Res Rev 2016; 8: 31–39.
-
- Cancio JM, Ikeda AJ, Barnicott SL, et al. Upper extremity amputation and prosthetics care across the active duty military and veteran populations. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2019; 30: 73–87.
-
- Soyer K, Unver B, Tamer S, et al. The importance of rehabilitation concerning upper extremity amputees: a systematic review. Pak J Med Sci 2016; 32: 1312–1319.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical