Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 2;23(16):5812-5824.
doi: 10.1039/d1gc01880a. eCollection 2021 Aug 16.

Complex coacervates as extraction media

Affiliations

Complex coacervates as extraction media

Jéré van Lente et al. Green Chem. .

Abstract

Various solvents such as ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, and aqueous two phase systems have been suggested as greener alternatives to existing extraction processes. We propose to add macroscopic complex coacervates to this list. Complex coacervates are liquid-like forms of polyion condensates and consist of a complex of oppositely charged polyions and water. Previous research focussing on the biological significance of these polyion-rich phases has shown that polyion condensates have the ability to extract certain solutes from water and back-extract them by changing parameters such as ionic strength and pH. In this study, we present the distribution coefficients of five commonly used industrial chemicals, namely lactic acid, butanol, and three types of lipase enzymes in poly(ethylenimine)/poly(acrylic acid) complex coacervates. It was found that the distribution coefficients can vary strongly upon variation of tunable parameters such as polyion ratio, ionic strength, polyion and compound concentrations, and temperature. Distribution coefficients ranged from approximately 2 to 50 depending on the tuning of the system parameters. It was also demonstrated that a temperature-swing extraction is possible, with back-extraction of butanol from complex coacervates with a recovery of 21.1%, demonstrating their potential as extraction media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. A schematic representation of the difference between ATPS and CC phase separation. In ATPS (left), the added constituents form separate aqueous phases. In CC (right), two oppositely charged polyions form a polyion-rich aqueous phase.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Analysis of CC formation properties. (A) Total CC formed as a function of F at a polyion concentration of 20 g L−1 and a NaCl concentration of 10 mM. Values are represented as average with standard deviations from triplicate experiments. (B) Photographs of different F ratios with consistent amounts of total polyions. (C) The water content of the formed CCs was determined using TGA for F = 0.26 and 0.36 at a polyion concentration of 10 g L−1 and a NaCl concentration of 10 mM. The left Y-axis shows the remaining mass fraction of the CC as the temperature presented on the right Y-axis is increased and water is vaporized. Values in (A) represent the average with standard deviations from triplicate experiments.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Distribution coefficients – KD for CALA (A, D and G), CALB (B, E and H), and PPL (C, F and I) as a function of CC composition (A–C), NaCl concentration (D–F), and polyion concentration (G–I). Unless otherwise specified, total polyion concentration is 5 g L−1, enzyme concentration is 67 μM, NaCl concentration is 10 mM, and F is 0.36 for CALB and 0.26 for CALA and PPL. Measurements are shown as average with standard deviation for n = 3, except (D), which is shown as individual measurements.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Lactic acid partitioning in PEI/PAA CC as a function of (A) CC composition, (B) NaCl concentration, (C) polyion concentration, (D) initial LA concentration, and (E) temperature. Unless otherwise specified, the experiments took place at approximately 20 °C, a polyion concentration of 5 g L−1, a LA concentration of 100 mM, a NaCl concentration of 10 mM, pH = 7, and F = 0.26. Results are shown as average with standard deviations for n = 3.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Interaction between butanol and PEI/PAA CCs. (A) Distribution coefficients of butanol in PEI/PAA CCs as a function of CC composition shown as an average with standard deviation with n = 2. (B) Distribution of butanol as a function of temperature for F = 0.26 and 0.36. For (A) and (B), the total polyion concentration was 5 g L−1, the NaCl concentration was 10 mM, and the butanol concentration was 400 mM. (C) Image of PEI/PAA CC at 50 g L−1 with (left) and without (right) the aqueous supernatant. (D) Butanol remaining in the CC at F = 0.26 during RT to 70 °C extraction and 70 °C to RT back-extraction. Data are shown as average with n = 4.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Distribution of LA as a function of NaCl concentration for PEI/PAA CC containing (A) CALA, (B) CALB, and (C) PPL lipase enzymes. Initial LA concentration was 100 mM, polyion concentration was 5 g L−1, and F = 0.26 for CALA, and 0.36 for CALB and PPL. Results are shown as individual independent experiments.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Distribution of butanol as a function of NaCl concentration for PEI/PAA CC containing (A) CALA, (B) CALB, and (C) PPL lipase enzymes. Initial butanol concentration was 400 mM, polyion concentration was 5 g L−1, and F = 0.26 for CALA, and 0.36 for CALB and PPL. Results are shown as individual independent samples.

References

    1. Welton T. Solvents and sustainable chemistry. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2015;471(2183):20150502. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2015.0502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tobiszewski M. Namieśnik J. Pena-Pereira F. Environmental risk-based ranking of solvents using the combination of a multimedia model and multi-criteria decision analysis. Green Chem. 2017;19(4):1034–1042. doi: 10.1039/C6GC03424A. - DOI
    1. Schuur B. Selection and design of ionic liquids as solvents in extractive distillation and extraction processes. Chem. Pap. 2015;69(2):245–253. doi: 10.1515/chempap-2015-0016. - DOI
    1. Marták J. Schlosser Š. New Mechanism and Model of Butyric Acid Extraction by Phosphonium Ionic Liquid. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2016;61(9):2979–2996. doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.5b01082. - DOI
    1. van Osch D. J. G. P. Zubeir L. F. van den Bruinhorst A. Rocha M. A. A. Kroon M. C. Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents as water-immiscible extractants. Green Chem. 2015;17(9):4518–4521. doi: 10.1039/C5GC01451D. - DOI