Comparison of Medical Student Learning Styles and Exam Performance in an Integrated Curriculum
- PMID: 34457523
- PMCID: PMC8368642
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00766-6
Comparison of Medical Student Learning Styles and Exam Performance in an Integrated Curriculum
Abstract
Background: There has been an emphasis on the implementation of self-directed learning in medical education. Kolb's experiential learning theory could be a useful framework in curriculum development.
Activity: During the 2016-2017 academic year, participants completed the learning styles inventory. Percent time dedicated to lecture, laboratory, small groups, modules, simulations, and exams was collected along with participant academic performance.
Results: Findings showed that the curriculum delivery accommodated Assimilators and Convergers, with Convergers primarily outscoring the other categories.
Discussion: Although efforts emphasized self-directed learning, the curriculum is still delivered by lectures. Based on Kolb's theory, lecturing benefits Converger and Assimilator learning styles.
Keywords: Course performance; Kolb’s theory; Learning styles inventory; Medical students.
© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Armstrong E, Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians’ learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. 2005;80(7):680–4. - PubMed
-
- Sternberg RJ, Zhang L. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. 1. Florence: Taylor and Francis; 2014.
-
- Guild PB, Garger S. Marching to different drummers, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. 2nd ed. Alexandria; 1998.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources