Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 28;29(3):691-696.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00739-9. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Insights into the Value of Student/Student Mentoring from the Mentor's Perspective

Affiliations

Insights into the Value of Student/Student Mentoring from the Mentor's Perspective

Anna Fleischman et al. Med Sci Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: Determine and describe the impact of student/student mentoring (SSM) on the senior medical student mentor involved in a formal SSM program.

Method: An anonymous online survey was administered to fourth-year medical students at the University of North Carolina with questions regarding participation in SSM programs (formal and informal) as well as the impact of these experiences. Responses from fourth-year mentors were compared to non-mentors' answers. Data was analyzed to assess the value of, understand motivations for not participating in, and to describe perceptions regarding SSM.

Results: One hundred seven of 178 students in the fourth-year class completed the survey, a 60% response rate. Forty-two students participated in the formal SSM program, 48 did not have mentors (non-mentors), and 17 were excluded as they participated in informal mentoring programs. There were no differences in gender, age, or matched specialty between mentors and non-mentors. Ninety-five percent of all students agreed that SSM was valuable in a way that was different from student/resident or student/faculty mentoring. Mentors were nearly twice as non-mentors likely to believe that being the mentee in an SSM relationship would be beneficial. In addition, mentors were 4 times more likely to believe that being a mentor in an SSM program was valuable and 83% stated they would mentor again. Lastly, nearly three quarters of mentors felt that this was a worthwhile experience.

Conclusions: Students who served as mentors as part of an SSM program had positive experiences and found it a valuable addition to traditional faculty/student mentoring.

Keywords: Academic mentoring; Medical student; Mentee; Peer to peer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study population

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crisp GCI. Mentoring college students: a critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Res High Educ. 2009;50(6):525–545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2. - DOI
    1. Merriam-Webster Inc . Merriam-Webster’s dictionary of law. Springfield. Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated; 2016.
    1. Cohen NH. Development and validation of the principles of adult mentoring for faculty mentors in higher education [dissertation]. Philadelphia: Temple University; 1993.
    1. Jacobi M. Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: a literature review. Rev Educ Res. 1991;61(4):505–532. doi: 10.3102/00346543061004505. - DOI
    1. Allard WG, Dodd JM, Peralez E. Keeping LD students in college. Acad Ther. 1987;22(4):359–365. doi: 10.1177/105345128702200403. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources