Insights into the Value of Student/Student Mentoring from the Mentor's Perspective
- PMID: 34457533
- PMCID: PMC8368820
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00739-9
Insights into the Value of Student/Student Mentoring from the Mentor's Perspective
Abstract
Objective: Determine and describe the impact of student/student mentoring (SSM) on the senior medical student mentor involved in a formal SSM program.
Method: An anonymous online survey was administered to fourth-year medical students at the University of North Carolina with questions regarding participation in SSM programs (formal and informal) as well as the impact of these experiences. Responses from fourth-year mentors were compared to non-mentors' answers. Data was analyzed to assess the value of, understand motivations for not participating in, and to describe perceptions regarding SSM.
Results: One hundred seven of 178 students in the fourth-year class completed the survey, a 60% response rate. Forty-two students participated in the formal SSM program, 48 did not have mentors (non-mentors), and 17 were excluded as they participated in informal mentoring programs. There were no differences in gender, age, or matched specialty between mentors and non-mentors. Ninety-five percent of all students agreed that SSM was valuable in a way that was different from student/resident or student/faculty mentoring. Mentors were nearly twice as non-mentors likely to believe that being the mentee in an SSM relationship would be beneficial. In addition, mentors were 4 times more likely to believe that being a mentor in an SSM program was valuable and 83% stated they would mentor again. Lastly, nearly three quarters of mentors felt that this was a worthwhile experience.
Conclusions: Students who served as mentors as part of an SSM program had positive experiences and found it a valuable addition to traditional faculty/student mentoring.
Keywords: Academic mentoring; Medical student; Mentee; Peer to peer.
© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Crisp GCI. Mentoring college students: a critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Res High Educ. 2009;50(6):525–545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2. - DOI
-
- Merriam-Webster Inc . Merriam-Webster’s dictionary of law. Springfield. Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated; 2016.
-
- Cohen NH. Development and validation of the principles of adult mentoring for faculty mentors in higher education [dissertation]. Philadelphia: Temple University; 1993.
-
- Jacobi M. Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: a literature review. Rev Educ Res. 1991;61(4):505–532. doi: 10.3102/00346543061004505. - DOI
-
- Allard WG, Dodd JM, Peralez E. Keeping LD students in college. Acad Ther. 1987;22(4):359–365. doi: 10.1177/105345128702200403. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources