Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 27;30(1):545-553.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00898-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.

A Medical Science Educator's Guide to Selecting a Research Paradigm: Building a Basis for Better Research

Affiliations

A Medical Science Educator's Guide to Selecting a Research Paradigm: Building a Basis for Better Research

Megan E L Brown et al. Med Sci Educ. .

Abstract

A research paradigm, or set of common beliefs about research, should be a key facet of any research project. However, despite its importance, there is a paucity of general understanding in the medical sciences education community regarding what a research paradigm consists of and how to best construct one. With the move within medical sciences education towards greater methodological rigor, it is now more important than ever for all educators to understand simply how to better approach their research via paradigms. In this monograph, a simplified approach to selecting an appropriate research paradigm is outlined. Suggestions are based on broad literature, medical education sources, and the author's own experiences in solidifying and communicating their research paradigms. By assisting in detailing the philosophical underpinnings of individuals research approaches, this guide aims to help all researchers improve the rigor of their projects and improve upon overall understanding in research communication.

Keywords: Medical education; Methodology; Paradigm; Research approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The building blocks forming a piece of work’s research paradigm and how they interrelate. Image is an adapted version of Grix’s paradigmatic building blocks [15]. Image adapted by authors to include axiology as an important block not originally detailed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The building blocks of a research project’s paradigm within the four main medical science education paradigms summarized. Each shape in the figure refers to one of the four main medical science paradigms. Each color refers to an element of a piece of research’s paradigm. Please see the key to this figure to aid with interpretation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Examples of real-world educational scenarios at a macro-, mid-, and microlevel and how consideration of different paradigms could be aligned to varying research aims and processes

References

    1. Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, O'Brien BC, Rees CE. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51(1):40–50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todres M, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical education research remains the poor relation. BMJ. 2007;335(7615):333–335. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39253.544688.94. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ. 2010;44(4):358–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monrouxe L, Rees C. Picking up the gauntlet. Med Educ. 2009;43(3):196–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03272.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources