A Novel USMLE Step 1 Projection Model Using a Single Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment Taken During a Brief Intense Study Period
- PMID: 34457866
- PMCID: PMC8368818
- DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01097-7
A Novel USMLE Step 1 Projection Model Using a Single Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment Taken During a Brief Intense Study Period
Abstract
Background: Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessments (CBSSAs) offered by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) are used by students to gauge preparedness for the United States Medical Licensing (USMLE) Step 1. Because residency programs value Step 1 scores, students expend many resources attempting to score highly on this exam. We sought to generate a predicted Step 1 score from a single CBSSA taken several days out from a planned exam date to inform student testing and study plans.
Methods: 2016 and 2017 Step 1 test takers at one US medical school were surveyed. The average daily score improvement from CBSSA to Step 1 during the 2016 study period was calculated and used to generate a predicted Step 1 score as well as mean absolute prediction errors (MAPEs). The predictive model was validated on 2017 data.
Results: In total, 43 of 61 respondents totaling 141 CBSSAs in 2016 and 37 of 43 respondents totaling 122 CBSSAs in 2017 were included. The final prediction model was [Predicted Step 1 = 292 - (292 - CBSSA score) * 0.987527 ^ (number of days out)]. In 2016, the average difference between predicted and actual scores was -0.81 (10.2) and the MAPE was 7.8. In 2017, 88 (72.1%) and 118 (96.7%) of true Step 1 scores fell within one and two standard deviations of a student's predicted score. There was a MAPE of 7.7. Practice form used (p = 0.19, 0.07) and how far out from actual Step 1 it was taken (p = 0.82, 0.38) were not significant in either year of study.
Conclusion: This projection model is reasonable for students to use to gauge their readiness for Step 1 while it remains a scored exam and provides a framework for future predictive model generation as the landscape of standardized testing changes in medical education.
Keywords: Projection modeling; Step 1; Testing; USMLE.
© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Resources That Improve Medical Board Licensing Examination Performance.Cureus. 2019 Oct 16;11(10):e5927. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5927. Cureus. 2019. PMID: 31788384 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of Medical College Admission Test Scores and Self-assessment Materials with the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance.Cureus. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):e7519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7519. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 32377467 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between performance on the NBME Comprehensive Basic Sciences Self-Assessment and USMLE Step 1 for U.S. and Canadian medical school students.Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S98-101. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed3f5c. Acad Med. 2010. PMID: 20881715
-
The USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Reporting Proposal: The APDR Position.Acad Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(10):1400-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Acad Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31383545 Review.
-
The USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Reporting Proposal: Another View.Acad Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(10):1403-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 8. Acad Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31296373 Review.
Cited by
-
Revisiting the Utility of the National Board of Medical Examiners Comprehensive Basic Science Self-Assessment to Gauge Readiness for USMLE Step 1.Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 19;35(1):149-155. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02155-0. eCollection 2025 Feb. Med Sci Educ. 2024. PMID: 40144132
-
Analysis of Oncology and Radiation Therapy Representation on the National Board of Medical Examiners Official Practice Material for the United States National Standardized Medical Board Examinations.J Cancer Educ. 2025 Feb;40(1):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02475-0. Epub 2024 Jul 13. J Cancer Educ. 2025. PMID: 38997529 Free PMC article.
-
USMLE step 1 and step 2 CK as indicators of resident performance.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04530-8. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37525136 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Student Experiences During USMLE Step 1 "Dedicated Preparation Period" via a Course Designed to Holistically Support Academic and Wellness Needs.Med Sci Educ. 2023 Apr 28;33(3):653-658. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01791-2. eCollection 2023 Jun. Med Sci Educ. 2023. PMID: 37501796 Free PMC article.
-
Why the Delay? Factors Predicting Step 1 Delay.Med Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 10;35(3):1215-1219. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02349-0. eCollection 2025 Jun. Med Sci Educ. 2025. PMID: 40625943 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Morrison CA, Ross LP, Fogle T, Butler A, Miller J, Dillon GF. Relationship between performance on the NBME comprehensive basic sciences self-assessment and USMLE step 1 for U.S. and Canadian medical school students. Acad Med. 2010;85(10 SUPPL). 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed3f5c. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources