Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;31(3):1157-1172.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01270-6. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Some Learning Theories for Medical Educators

Affiliations

Some Learning Theories for Medical Educators

Hongmei Dong et al. Med Sci Educ. .

Abstract

Perspectives on the nature of learning influence decisions about curriculum design, teaching and learning strategies, and assessment of students. Current literature on medical education suggests that medical teachers have much interest in using theories to inform their practice. This article describes the following learning theories that have been discussed to various degrees in previous literature on medical education: cognitivism, constructivism, experiential learning, adult learning, self-directed learning, community of practice and situated learning, cognitive apprenticeship, and reflective learning. Each theory is explained in sufficient detail to help readers grasp its essence. Then, medical education literature is cited to show how the theory has been used or can be used to guide practice in medical education. Finally, this article analyzes the problem-based learning approach as an example to illustrate how the theories may be reflected in practice. Throughout the introduction of the various theories, this article aims at their application in medical education and attempts to draw connections among the theories rather than represent them as unrelated or competing ideas.

Keywords: Learning theories; Learning theories for medical educators; Medical education; Medical education practice; Perspectives on learning; Theoretical approaches to learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kolb’s experiential learning cycle

References

    1. Kaufman D, Mann K. Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory, and practice. Wiley Blackwell; 2010. pp.16–36.
    1. Mann K. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lyons K, McLaughlin J, Khanova J, Roth M. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(3):723–739. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9707-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Merrienboer J, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44:85–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Issa N, Mayer R, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro M, DaRosa D. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Med Educ. 2013;47:388–396. doi: 10.1111/medu.12127. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources