Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 9:24:e00129.
doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129. eCollection 2021 Sep.

A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs

Alec Barlow  1 , Kayla Roy  1 , Kristopher Hawkins  1 , Ako A Ankarah  1 , Benjamin Rosenthal  1
Affiliations

A review of testing and assurance methods for Trichinella surveillance programs

Alec Barlow et al. Food Waterborne Parasitol. .

Abstract

While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of Trichinella larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion.

Keywords: Magnetic stir Bar method; Pork surveillance; Trichinella.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no competing interests in the content of this review. The work was funded from public sources and performed in the public interest without regard for commercial interests of any kind, and with the sole desire to support science-based decision making and to advance public health.

Figures

Unlabelled Image
Graphical abstract
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Almeida M.D., Bishop H., Nascimento F.S., Mathison B., Bradbury R.S., Silva A.D. Multiplex TaqMan qPCR assay for specific identification of encapsulated Trichinella species prevalent in North America. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2018;113(11) doi: 10.1590/0074-02760180305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso M., Herrero B., Vieites J.M., Espiñeira M. Real-time PCR assay for detection of Trichinella in meat. Food Control. 2011;22(8):1333–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.02.009. - DOI
    1. Atterby H., Learmount J., Conyers C., Zimmer I., Boonham N., Taylor M. Development of a real-time PCR assay for the detection of Trichinella spiralis in situ. Vet. Parasitol. 2009;161(1–2):92–98. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.12.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beck R., Mihaljević Ž., Marinculić A. Comparison of trichinelloscopy with a digestion method for the detection of Trichinella larvae in muscle tissue from naturally infected pigs with low level infections. Vet. Parasitol. 2005;132(1–2):97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bogitsh J.B., Carter E.C., Oeltmann N.T. Human Parasitology. Fourth edition. Academic Press; 2013. Chapter 16 - Intestinal Nematodes; pp. 291–327. ISBN 9780124159150. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources