Complexities of Continuing Professional Development in Context: Physician Engagement in Clinical Coaching
- PMID: 34459442
- DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000382
Complexities of Continuing Professional Development in Context: Physician Engagement in Clinical Coaching
Abstract
Introduction: Effective continuing professional development (CPD) is critical for safe and effective health care. Recent shifts have called for a move away from didactic CPD, which often fails to affect practice, toward workplace learning such as clinical coaching. Unfortunately, coaching programs are complex, and adoption does not guarantee effectiveness. To resolve this problem, thus ensuring resources are well spent, there is a critical need to understand what physicians try to achieve and how they engage. Therefore, we examined the types of change physicians pursue through clinical coaching and the impact of context on their desired changes.
Methods: In the context of two clinical coaching programs for rural physicians, we applied a generic qualitative approach. Coachees (N = 15) participated in semistructured interviews. Analysis involved iterative cycles of initial, focused, and theoretical coding.
Results: Coachees articulated desired practice changes along a spectrum, ranging from honing their current practice to making larger changes that involved new skills outside their current practice; changes also ranged from those focused on individual physicians to those focused on the practice system. Desired changes were affected by factors in the learning/practice environment, including those related to the individual coachee, coach, and learning/practice context.
Discussion: These results suggest that the current focus on acquiring new knowledge through CPD may miss important learning that involves subtle shifts in practice as well as learning that focusses on systems change. Moreover, an appreciation of the contextual nature of CPD can ensure that contextual affordances are leveraged and barriers are acknowledged.
Copyright © 2021 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Opalek A, et al. Patients of doctors further from medical school graduation have poorer outcomes. Med Educ. 2017;51:480–489.
-
- Légaré F, Freitas A, Thompson-Leduc P, et al. The majority of accredited continuing professional development activities do not target clinical behavior change. Acad Med. 2015;90:197–202.
-
- Bloom BS. Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:380–385.
-
- Lovell B. What do we know about coaching in medical education? A literature review. Med Educ. 2018;52:376–390.
-
- Schrewe B, Ellaway RH, Watling C, et al. The contextual curriculum: learning in the matrix, from the matrix. Acad Med. 2018;93:1645–1651.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources