Advancing Intersectional Discrimination Measures for Health Disparities Research: Protocol for a Bilingual Mixed Methods Measurement Study
- PMID: 34459747
- PMCID: PMC8438612
- DOI: 10.2196/30987
Advancing Intersectional Discrimination Measures for Health Disparities Research: Protocol for a Bilingual Mixed Methods Measurement Study
Abstract
Background: Guided by intersectionality frameworks, researchers have documented health disparities at the intersection of multiple axes of social status and position, particularly race and ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. To advance from identifying to intervening in such intersectional health disparities, studies that examine the underlying mechanisms are required. Although much research demonstrates the negative health impacts of perceived discrimination along single axes, quantitative approaches to assessing the role of discrimination in generating intersectional health disparities remain in their infancy. Members of our team recently introduced the Intersectional Discrimination Index (InDI) to address this gap. The InDI comprises three measures of enacted (day-to-day and major) and anticipated discrimination. These attribution-free measures ask about experiences of mistreatment because of who you are. These measures show promise for intersectional health disparities research but require further validation across intersectional groups and languages. In addition, the proposal to remove attributions is controversial, and no direct comparison has ever been conducted.
Objective: This study aims to cognitively and psychometrically evaluate the InDI in English and Spanish and determine whether attributions should be included.
Methods: The study will draw on a preliminary validation data set and three original sequentially collected sources of data: qualitative cognitive interviews in English and Spanish with a sample purposively recruited across intersecting social status and position (gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, and nativity); a Spanish quantitative survey (n=500; 250/500, 50% sexual and gender minorities); and an English quantitative survey (n=3000), with quota sampling by race and ethnicity (Black, Latino/a/x, and White), sexual or gender minority status, and gender.
Results: The study was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities in May 2021, and data collection began in July 2021.
Conclusions: The key deliverables of the study will be bilingual measures of anticipated, day-to-day, and major discrimination validated for multiple health disparity populations using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods.
International registered report identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/30987.
Keywords: discrimination; health disparities; measurement; psychometrics; racism; stigma; survey research.
©Ayden I Scheim, Greta R Bauer, João L Bastos, Tonia Poteat. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 30.08.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
The Intersectional Discrimination Index: Development and validation of measures of self-reported enacted and anticipated discrimination for intercategorical analysis.Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.016. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Soc Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 30674436
-
Biopsychosocial Mechanisms Linking Gender Minority Stress to HIV Comorbidities Among Black and Latina Transgender Women (LITE Plus): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Longitudinal Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 13;9(4):e17076. doi: 10.2196/17076. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 32281542 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities.Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:236-245. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 21. Soc Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 30674435
-
Intersectional discrimination and its impact on Asian American women's mental health: A mixed-methods scoping review.Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;11:993396. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.993396. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36923035 Free PMC article.
-
A Narrative Review of the Current Research in Cancer-Related Pain Inequities: The Necessity of Applying Intersectionality to Advance Cancer Pain Research.Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241274256. doi: 10.1177/10732748241274256. Cancer Control. 2024. PMID: 39172777 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Intersectional discrimination, mental health, and health care access among transgender women in Brazil.Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;44(3):256-265. doi: 10.1037/hea0001447. Health Psychol. 2025. PMID: 39992771
-
Multiple Dimensions of Machismo: Linguistic Considerations for Latino Sexual Minority Men in the United States.J Mens Stud. 2024 Oct;32(3):421-449. doi: 10.1177/10608265241234361. Epub 2024 Feb 18. J Mens Stud. 2024. PMID: 39372964
-
Developing Guidelines for Conducting Stigma Research With Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: Protocol for Creation of a Trauma-Informed Approach to Research.JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 6;14:e66800. doi: 10.2196/66800. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025. PMID: 39761548 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . In: Understanding the Well-Being of LGBTQI+ Populations. Patterson C, Sepúlveda M, White J, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020. - PubMed
-
- Crenshaw K. Demarginalizing the intersection of racesex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theoryantiracist politics. In: Bartlett K, Kennedy R, editors. Feminist Legal Theory. Milton, UK: Routledge; 1989. pp. 1–446.
-
- King DK. Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: the context of a black feminist ideology. Signs J Women Cult Soc. 1988 Oct;14(1):42–72. doi: 10.1086/494491. - DOI
-
- Collins P. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Milton, UK: Routledge; 2002. pp. 1–384.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous