Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 1;78(10):1228-1235.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2915.

Risk of Rupture After Intracranial Aneurysm Growth

Affiliations

Risk of Rupture After Intracranial Aneurysm Growth

Laura T van der Kamp et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Figure.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Neurol. 2022 Mar 1;79(3):312. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5146. JAMA Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35006239 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms not undergoing preventive endovascular or neurosurgical treatment are often monitored radiologically to detect aneurysm growth, which is associated with an increase in risk of rupture. However, the absolute risk of aneurysm rupture after detection of growth remains unclear.

Objective: To determine the absolute risk of rupture of an aneurysm after detection of growth during follow-up and to develop a prediction model for rupture.

Design, setting, and participants: Individual patient data were obtained from 15 international cohorts. Patients 18 years and older who had follow-up imaging for at least 1 untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm with growth detected at follow-up imaging and with 1 day or longer of follow-up after growth were included. Fusiform or arteriovenous malformation-related aneurysms were excluded. Of the 5166 eligible patients who had follow-up imaging for intracranial aneurysms, 4827 were excluded because no aneurysm growth was detected, and 27 were excluded because they had less than 1 day follow-up after detection of growth.

Exposures: All included aneurysms had growth, defined as 1 mm or greater increase in 1 direction at follow-up imaging.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was aneurysm rupture. The absolute risk of rupture was measured with the Kaplan-Meier estimate at 3 time points (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) after initial growth. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of rupture after growth detection.

Results: A total of 312 patients were included (223 [71%] were women; mean [SD] age, 61 [12] years) with 329 aneurysms with growth. During 864 aneurysm-years of follow-up, 25 (7.6%) of these aneurysms ruptured. The absolute risk of rupture after growth was 2.9% (95% CI, 0.9-4.9) at 6 months, 4.3% (95% CI, 1.9-6.7) at 1 year, and 6.0% (95% CI, 2.9-9.1) at 2 years. In multivariable analyses, predictors of rupture were size (7 mm or larger hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-7.2), shape (irregular hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.5), and site (middle cerebral artery hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.8-16.3; anterior cerebral artery, posterior communicating artery, or posterior circulation hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.6-13.0). In the triple-S (size, site, shape) prediction model, the 1-year risk of rupture ranged from 2.1% to 10.6%.

Conclusion and relevance: Within 1 year after growth detection, rupture occurred in approximately 1 of 25 aneurysms. The triple-S risk prediction model can be used to estimate absolute risk of rupture for the initial period after detection of growth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr van den Berg reports fees from Cerenovus paid to his institution outside the submitted work. Dr Boogaarts reports fees for serving as a consultant for Stryker Neurovascular outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Time to Rupture After Observation of Intracranial Aneurysm Growth

References

    1. Vlak MHM, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJE. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):626-636. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gabriel RA, Kim H, Sidney S, et al. . Ten-year detection rate of brain arteriovenous malformations in a large, multiethnic, defined population. Stroke. 2010;41(1):21-26. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greving JP, Wermer MJH, Brown RD Jr, et al. . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(1):59-66. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI, et al. . Procedural clinical complications, case-fatality risks, and risk factors in endovascular and neurosurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):282-293. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Villablanca JP, Duckwiler GR, Jahan R, et al. . Natural history of asymptomatic unruptured cerebral aneurysms evaluated at CT angiography: growth and rupture incidence and correlation with epidemiologic risk factors. Radiology. 2013;269(1):258-265. doi:10.1148/radiol.13121188 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types