Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;305(4):885-892.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06213-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Relevance of the antenatal corticosteroids-to-delivery interval in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome through the eyes of causal inference: a review and target trial

Affiliations
Review

Relevance of the antenatal corticosteroids-to-delivery interval in the prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome through the eyes of causal inference: a review and target trial

Isabelle Dehaene et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To critically analyse the literature on the antenatal corticosteroids (ACS)-to-birth interval from a causal point of view and to present a solution to the problem of bias caused by post hoc analysis.

Methods: Due to the post hoc nature of the ACS-to-birth interval, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of ACS versus placebo is not able to examine the importance of the interval. When an RCT is not feasible, for whatsoever reason, a target trial can be set up and an attempt can be made to answer the causal question of interest using observational data. An attempt was made to set up a target trial which could enable to examine the causal effect of the ACS-to-birth interval on neonatal outcomes. An analysis of current literature on the ACS-to-birth interval was done.

Results: The majority of studies aimed to examine the causal effect of the interval, but their study design only permitted to find associations between the interval and neonatal outcomes. Barriers for setting up a target trial are highlighted.

Conclusion: Evidence on the superiority of any ACS-to-birth interval is lacking and the question can only be addressed causally and become clinically relevant if baseline randomisation to ACS-to-birth intervals is made possible.

Keywords: Antenatal corticosteroids-to-birth interval; Causal inference; Preterm birth; Respiratory distress syndrome; Target trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liggins GC, Howie RN (1972) A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 50(4):515–525 - PubMed
    1. WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/183037/9789241508988_en... . Retrieved 4 Feb 2019.
    1. Crowley P (1995) Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(1):322–335 - PubMed
    1. Crowther C, McKinlay C, Middleton P, Harding J (2015) Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD003935
    1. Bruijn M, Vis J, Wilms F, Oudijk M, Kwee A, Porath M et al (2016) Comparison of the Actim Partus test and the fetal fibronectin test in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women undergoing cervical length measurement. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 206:220–224 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources