Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 23;6(11):113.
doi: 10.3390/jimaging6110113.

Fully 3D Active Surface with Machine Learning for PET Image Segmentation

Affiliations

Fully 3D Active Surface with Machine Learning for PET Image Segmentation

Albert Comelli. J Imaging. .

Abstract

In order to tackle three-dimensional tumor volume reconstruction from Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images, most of the existing algorithms rely on the segmentation of independent PET slices. To exploit cross-slice information, typically overlooked in these 2D implementations, I present an algorithm capable of achieving the volume reconstruction directly in 3D, by leveraging an active surface algorithm. The evolution of such surface performs the segmentation of the whole stack of slices simultaneously and can handle changes in topology. Furthermore, no artificial stop condition is required, as the active surface will naturally converge to a stable topology. In addition, I include a machine learning component to enhance the accuracy of the segmentation process. The latter consists of a forcing term based on classification results from a discriminant analysis algorithm, which is included directly in the mathematical formulation of the energy function driving surface evolution. It is worth noting that the training of such a component requires minimal data compared to more involved deep learning methods. Only eight patients (i.e., two lung, four head and neck, and two brain cancers) were used for training and testing the machine learning component, while fifty patients (i.e., 10 lung, 25 head and neck, and 15 brain cancers) were used to test the full 3D reconstruction algorithm. Performance evaluation is based on the same dataset of patients discussed in my previous work, where the segmentation was performed using the 2D active contour. The results confirm that the active surface algorithm is superior to the active contour algorithm, outperforming the earlier approach on all the investigated anatomical districts with a dice similarity coefficient of 90.47 ± 2.36% for lung cancer, 88.30 ± 2.89% for head and neck cancer, and 90.29 ± 2.52% for brain cancer. Based on the reported results, it can be claimed that the migration into a 3D system yielded a practical benefit justifying the effort to rewrite an existing 2D system for PET imaging segmentation.

Keywords: 3D segmentation; PET imaging; active surface; discriminant analysis; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the Positron Emission Tomography (PET) system proposed in the previous work (A) [24], and the implementation set out here (B). The proposed implementation substitutes the ‘Slice Marching Segmentation’ block (A) with the fully “3D Segmentation” block (B). Therefore, cross-slice information previously ignored is now being completely exploited. Moreover, the artificial stopping condition (step i) is no longer necessary. Additionally, (steps b, c, f, and g) were modified in order to provide a 3D sampling and training (step b1), a 3D tissue classification (step c1), 3D contour initialization (step f1), and 3D AS (step g1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Classification performance of the 3D DA classifier was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) using the ROC analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three different tumors reported in the figure show the difference between 2D active contours (a,d,g) [24] and 3D active surface (b,e,h) segmentations guided by the 3D classifier. The reconstructed surfaces (green and red) and the gold standards (in yellow) are rendered partially transparent for better comparison. In the last column, the overlap of both methods and the gold standard is shown (c,f,i). Specifically, an over-segmentation of the 2D approach compared to 3D can be observed. (Color images can be found on the electronic version of this article).

References

    1. Niyazi M., Landrock S., Elsner A., Manapov F., Hacker M., Belka C., Ganswindt U. Automated biological target volume delineation for radiotherapy treatment planning using FDG-PET/CT. Radiat. Oncol. 2013;8:180. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borasi G., Russo G., Alongi F., Nahum A., Candiano G.C., Stefano A., Gilardi M.C., Messa C. High-intensity focused ultrasound plus concomitant radiotherapy: A new weapon in oncology? J. Ther. Ultrasound. 2013;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-1-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guo Z., Guo N., Gong K., Zhong S., Li Q. Gross tumor volume segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using deep dense multi-modality network. Phys. Med. Biol. 2019;64:205015. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab440d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wahl R.L., Jacene H., Kasamon Y., Lodge M.A. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J. Nucl. Med. 2009;50:122S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cegla P., Kazmierska J., Gwozdz S., Czepczynski R., Malicki J., Cholewinski W. Assessment of biological parameters in head and neck cancer based on in vivo distribution of 18F-FDG-FLT-FMISO-PET/CT images. Tumori. 2019;106:33–38. doi: 10.1177/0300891619868012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources