Complications after interval postpartum intrauterine device insertion
- PMID: 34461075
- PMCID: PMC8940222
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.028
Complications after interval postpartum intrauterine device insertion
Abstract
Background: In the United States, up to 57% of women report resumption of sexual activity by the 6 week postpartum visit. Effective contraception should be addressed and provided at that time, to avoid unintended pregnancies and optimize interpregnancy intervals. Long-acting reversible contraceptives are the most effective forms of reversible contraception and are increasingly popular during the postpartum period. However, timing of postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement varies among providers and many delay insertion due to concerns for uterine perforation or expulsion of the IUD.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate uterine perforation and expulsion rates with IUD insertion at 4-8 weeks postpartum vs 9-36 weeks postpartum.
Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic medical record from 2010 to 2016. We calculated the proportion of perforations and expulsions with IUD insertion at 4-8 weeks vs 9-36 weeks postpartum. Our primary outcome was the perforation rate. Secondarily, we evaluated the expulsion rate. For our minimum sample size calculation, to detect a difference of 0.5% in the perforation rate, with a baseline perforation rate of 0.5% for the 9-36 week postpartum IUD placement group, 80% power, and 5% alpha error rate, we would need at least 4221 participants per group, 8442 in total.
Results: A total of 24,959 patients met inclusion criteria (n=13,180 in the 4-8 week group, n=11,777 in the 9-36 week group). Of 430 patients with a confirmed complication, 157 uterine perforations and 273 IUD expulsions were identified. Perforation rates were significantly higher with placement at 4-8 weeks than at 9-36 weeks (0.78% vs 0.46%; P=.001). After adjusting for race and ethnicity, breastfeeding, IUD type, provider type, parity, most recent delivery, and body mass index, the odds of perforation remained higher with placement at 4-8 weeks than at 9-36 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.89). Our Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the risk of uterine perforation remained elevated until approximately 22-23 weeks postpartum. Expulsion rates were similar between the 2 groups (1.02 vs 1.17; P=.52).
Conclusion: Uterine perforation after interval postpartum IUD insertion is greater at 4-8 weeks than at 9-36 weeks, although perforation rates remain low at <1%. Expulsion rates did not differ between the groups. Because overall rates of uterine perforation are low, women can safely be offered IUDs at any interval beyond 4 weeks with minimal concern for perforation.
Keywords: interval intrauterine device insertion; intrauterine device expulsion; intrauterine device insertion complications; long-acting reversible contraception; postpartum; uterine perforation.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):599.e1-599.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33460585
-
Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.Contraception. 1992 Apr;45(4):351-61. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90057-z. Contraception. 1992. PMID: 1516367
-
Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48474. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35226086 Free PMC article.
-
Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32142826 Free PMC article.
-
Society of Family Planning Guidelines: Postplacental insertion of intrauterine devices.Contraception. 2018 Jan;97(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 5. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 28987293 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Retained Lippes Loop Intrauterine Device Causes Vesicouterine Fistula.Cureus. 2023 Apr 27;15(4):e38217. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38217. eCollection 2023 Apr. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37252518 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Oral Medications or Intrauterine Device-Delivered Progestin in Patients with Endometrial Hyperplasia with or without Atypia: A Network Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 19;12(8):2980. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082980. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37109316 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Open surgical retrieval of intra-uterine contraceptive device perforating the ileum: A case report.Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023 Aug;109:108635. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108635. Epub 2023 Aug 6. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37552923 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McDonald EA, Brown SJ. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? BJOG 2013;120: 823–30. - PubMed
-
- Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295:1809–23. - PubMed
-
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: optimizing postpartum care. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e140–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous