Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 31;25(1):309.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03673-8.

Still a place for aortic counterpulsation in cardiac surgery and patients with cardiogenic shock?

Matthias Heringlake  1 , Astrid Ellen Berggreen  2 , Hauke Paarmann  2
Affiliations
Review

Still a place for aortic counterpulsation in cardiac surgery and patients with cardiogenic shock?

Matthias Heringlake et al. Crit Care. .

Erratum in

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2021. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2021 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The effects of different treatment strategies on hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock. a Hospital mortality from cardiogenic shock (based on ICD-10 code R57.0 as a main or secondary diagnosis) derived from the German Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics (DESTATIS). Data are based on 333,459 patients treated medically, 36,805 patients treated with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and 9774 patients treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) from Ref. [20]. b Hospital mortality from cardiogenic shock derived from the “Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey” (ACSIS) in 428 patients with cardiogenic shock treated with an IABP (n = 217) or medically (n = 211) from Ref. [21]. *Significant difference between medical and IABP treatment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS, Phillips SJ, Butner AN, Sherman JL., Jr Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 1968;203:113–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1968.03140020041011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1287–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang L, Wang H, Hou X. Clinical outcomes of adult patients who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:2087–93. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.03.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amin AP, Spertus JA, Curtis JP, Desai N, Masoudi FA, Bach RG, et al. The evolving landscape of impella use in the United States among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation. 2020;141:273–84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044007. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources