Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Oct;16(10):1491-1501.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.01930221. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Effects of Spironolactone and Chlorthalidone on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Spironolactone and Chlorthalidone on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial

Nicola C Edwards et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background and objectives: In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with spironolactone in early-stage CKD reduced left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness compared with placebo. It is not known if these effects were due to BP reduction or specific vascular and myocardial effects of spironolactone.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study conducted in four UK centers (Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and London) comparing spironolactone 25 mg to chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily for 40 weeks in 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD (eGFR 30-89 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had controlled BP (target ≤130/80 mm Hg).

Results: There was no significant difference in left ventricular mass regression; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was -3.8 g (95% confidence interval, -8.1 to 0.5 g, P=0.08). Office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs fell in response to both drugs with no significant differences between treatment. Pulse wave velocity was not significantly different between groups; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was 0.04 m/s (-0.4 m/s, 0.5 m/s, P=0.90). Hyperkalemia (defined ≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred more frequently with spironolactone (12 versus two participants, adjusted relative risk was 5.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 22.1, P=0.02), but there were no patients with severe hyperkalemia (defined ≥6.5 mEq/L). A decline in eGFR >30% occurred in eight participants treated with chlorthalidone compared with two participants with spironolactone (adjusted relative risk was 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.1, P=0.07).

Conclusions: Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, BP, or arterial stiffness in nondiabetic CKD.

Keywords: aldosterone; cardiovascular system; chlorthalidone; chronic kidney disease; randomized controlled trials; spironolactone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram: Eligibility, randomization, and follow-up. *Side effects leading to patient withdrawal of spironolactone: inflamed gums, symptomatic hyponatremia, and worsening of polymyalgia rheumatica and back and leg pain. Side effects leading to patient withdrawal of chlorthalidone: dizziness and headache, too many unwanted side effects from being on irbesartan necessary for the trial, and patient concern about kidney function. CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Change in left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index in patients treated with spironolactone and chlorthalidone. On intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in either drug for change in left ventricular mass (P=0.08) or left ventricular mass indexed to BSA (P=0.19) using a linear regression model adjusted for minimization variables and baseline left ventricular mass. LV, left ventricular.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Changes in office systolic and diastolic BP over follow-up. Change in systolic BP (A) and diastolic BP (B) associated with spironolactone (solid line) and chlorthalidone (dashed line) from initiation to end of treatment at week 40, followed by reassessment 4 weeks after cessation of the trial drug. Data are mean and 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Change in left ventricular mass and 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP after 40 weeks of treatment with spironolactone or chlorthalidone.

References

    1. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, McCullough PA, Kasiske BL, Kelepouris E, Klag MJ, Parfrey P, Pfeffer M, Raij L, Spinosa DJ, Wilson PW; American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention : Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: A statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Hypertension 42: 1050–1065, 2003 - PubMed
    1. Thomas B, Matsushita K, Abate KH, Al-Aly Z, Ärnlöv J, Asayama K, Atkins R, Badawi A, Ballew SH, Banerjee A, Barregård L, Barrett-Connor E, Basu S, Bello AK, Bensenor I, Bergstrom J, Bikbov B, Blosser C, Brenner H, Carrero JJ, Chadban S, Cirillo M, Cortinovis M, Courville K, Dandona L, Dandona R, Estep K, Fernandes J, Fischer F, Fox C, Gansevoort RT, Gona PN, Gutierrez OM, Hamidi S, Hanson SW, Himmelfarb J, Jassal SK, Jee SH, Jha V, Jimenez-Corona A, Jonas JB, Kengne AP, Khader Y, Khang YH, Kim YJ, Klein B, Klein R, Kokubo Y, Kolte D, Lee K, Levey AS, Li Y, Lotufo P, El Razek HMA, Mendoza W, Metoki H, Mok Y, Muraki I, Muntner PM, Noda H, Ohkubo T, Ortiz A, Perico N, Polkinghorne K, Al-Radaddi R, Remuzzi G, Roth G, Rothenbacher D, Satoh M, Saum KU, Sawhney M, Schöttker B, Shankar A, Shlipak M, Silva DAS, Toyoshima H, Ukwaja K, Umesawa M, Vollset SE, Warnock DG, Werdecker A, Yamagishi K, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Zaki MES, Naghavi M, Forouzanfar MH, Murray CJL, Coresh J, Vos T; Global Burden of Disease 2013 GFR Collaborators; CKD Prognosis Consortium; Global Burden of Disease Genitourinary Expert Group : Global cardiovascular and renal outcomes of reduced GFR. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 2167–2179, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gansevoort RT, Correa-Rotter R, Hemmelgarn BR, Jafar TH, Heerspink HJ, Mann JF, Matsushita K, Wen CP: Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet 382: 339–352, 2013 - PubMed
    1. Edwards NC, Moody WE, Chue CD, Ferro CJ, Townend JN, Steeds RP: Defining the natural history of uremic cardiomyopathy in chronic kidney disease: The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7: 703–714, 2014 - PubMed
    1. Bomback AS, Klemmer PJ: The incidence and implications of aldosterone breakthrough. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 3: 486–492, 2007 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances