Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC)
- PMID: 34462785
- PMCID: PMC8484094
- DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03756-7
Patterns of undertreatment among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): considerations for patients eligible for non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC)
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a life-threatening malignancy that is more prevalent in the elderly. Because the patient population is heterogenous and advanced in age, choosing the optimal therapy can be challenging. There is strong evidence supporting antileukemic therapy, including standard intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) and non-intensive chemotherapy (NIC), for older patients with AML, and guidelines recommend treatment selection based on a patient's individual and disease characteristics as opposed to age alone. Nonetheless, historic evidence indicates that a high proportion of patients who may be candidates for NIC receive no active antileukemic treatment (NAAT), instead receiving only best supportive care (BSC). We conducted a focused literature review to assess current real-world patterns of undertreatment in AML. From a total of 25 identified studies reporting the proportion of patients with AML receiving NAAT, the proportion of patients treated with NAAT varied widely, ranging from 10 to 61.4% in the US and 24.1 to 35% in Europe. Characteristics associated with receipt of NAAT included clinical factors such as age, poor performance status, comorbidities, and uncontrolled concomitant conditions, as well as sociodemographic factors such as female sex, unmarried status, and lower income. Survival was diminished among patients receiving NAAT, with reported median overall survival values ranging from 1.2 to 4.8 months compared to 5 to 14.4 months with NIC. These findings suggest a proportion of patients who are candidates for NIC receive NAAT, potentially forfeiting the survival benefit of active antileukemic treatment.
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Non-intensive chemotherapy; Real-world evidence; Treatment patterns; Undertreatment.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
EH is an employee of Purple Squirrel Economics, who were paid consultants to Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript. SS, TB, AB, VW, AR-S, and PD are employees of and own stock in Pfizer, Inc.
References
-
- Acuna-Cruz E (2020) Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes of 3637 ≥60 year-old patients with newly diagnosed AML reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. EHA 25. https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2020/eha25th/294488. Accessed 16 June 2020
-
- Byrne MM, Halman LJ, Koniaris LG et al (2011) Effects of poverty and race on outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Clin Oncol 34:297–304. 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181dea934 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical