Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct;32(7):1291-1299.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03103-z. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Tiago Amorim-Barbosa  1 , Catarina Pereira  2 , Diogo Catelas  2 , Cláudia Rodrigues  2 , Paulo Costa  2 , Ricardo Rodrigues-Pinto  2 , Pedro Neves  2
Affiliations

Risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after transforaminal and posterior lumbar interbody fusion

Tiago Amorim-Barbosa et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cage subsidence is a very common complication after lumbar interbody fusion. It may compromise vertebral interbody fusion through progressive spinal deformity and consequently cause compression of neural elements. Clinical relevance remains, however, unclear, with few studies on this subject and even less information regarding its correlation with clinical findings. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for cage subsidence and clinical evaluation after transforaminal (TLIF) and posterior (PLIF) lumbar interbody fusion.

Methods: A retrospective study in patients submitted to TLIF and PLIF between 2008 and 2017 was conducted.

Results: A total of 165 patients were included (123 TLIF and 42 PLIF). Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of cage subsidence in spondylolisthesis comparing with degenerative disk disease (p = 0.007). A higher preoperative lumbar lordosis angle (p = 0.014) and cage placement in L2-L3 (p = 0.012) were associated with higher risk of subsidence. The posterior cage positioning on vertebral endplate was associated with a higher risk of subsidence (p = 0.028) and significant subsidence (p = 0.005), defined as cage migration > 50% of cage height. PLIF presented a higher risk when comparing with TLIF (p = 0.024). Hounsfield unit (HU) values < 135 (OR6; 95% CI [1.95-34]) and posterior positioning (OR7; 95% CI [1.7-27.3]) were independent risk factors for cage subsidence and significant subsidence, respectively, in multivariate analysis. There was a tendency for significant subsidence in degrees ≥ 2 of Meyerding spondylolisthesis (OR4; 95% CI [0.85-21.5]). Significant cage subsidence was not associated with worse clinical results. Other analyzed factors, such as age (p = 0.008), low bone mineral density (BMD) (p = 0.029) and type of surgery (TLIF) (p = 0.004), were associated with worse results.

Conclusion: The present study shows that lower BMD and posterior cage positioning are relevant risk factors for lumbar cage subsidence. Low BMD is also a predictor of poor clinical results, so it must be properly evaluated and considered, through HU values measurement in CT scan, a feasible and reliable tool in perioperative planning.

Keywords: Cage subsidence; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Labrom RD, Tan JS, Reilly CW, Tredwell SJ, Fisher CG, Oxland TR (2005) The effect of interbody cage positioning on lumbosacral vertebral endplate failure in compression. Spine 30(19):E556–E561. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000181053.38677.c2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schiffman M, Brau SA, Henderson R, Gimmestad G (2003) Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis. Spine J 3(5):377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbushi A, Cabraja M, Thomale UW, Woiciechowsky C, Kroppenstedt SN (2009) The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation. Eur Spine J 18(11):1621–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1036-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF (2001) Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates. Spine 26(8):889–896. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104150-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jost B, Cripton PA, Lund T et al (1998) Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density. Eur Spine J 7(2):132–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050043 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources