Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;86(5):1495-1517.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01579-2. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality

Jonathan B Banks  1 , Matthew S Welhaf  2
Affiliations

Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality

Jonathan B Banks et al. Psychol Res. 2022 Jul.

Erratum in

Abstract

Individual differences in executive control ability reliably show that those with greater executive control report fewer instances of mind wandering during moderately demanding tasks. However, these findings have been limited in that they often treated mind wandering as a variable that collapsed across a variety of thought categories or dimensions. We suggest that two dimensions of mind wandering, intentionality and emotional valence, may be differential related to individual difference in executive control ability. The present study examined this using multiple measures of working memory capacity and attentional control while measuring emotional valence and intentionality of mind wandering during a single sustained attention task. Non-cognitive predictors of mind wandering were also measured. Overall, the results suggest that both working memory capacity and attention control are significant predictors of mind wandering propensity, replicating previous findings. However, the dimensions of emotional valence and intentionality suggested that this finding was not consistent across all types of thought reports. The current findings provide support for the view that it is critical to consider these two dimensions, among other important dimensions, of mind wandering to have a more complete understanding of individual differences in mind wandering.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, T., Petranker, R., Lin, H., & Farb, N. A. S. (2021). The metronome response task for measuring mind wandering: Replication attempt and extension of three studies by Seli et al. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 83, 315–330.
    1. Baer, R. A., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., Smith, G. T., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. - PubMed
    1. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1604–1611. - PubMed
    1. Banks, J. B., Jha, A. P., Hood, A. V. B., Goller, H. G., & Craig, L. L. (2019). Reducing the TUTs that hurt: The impact of a brief mindfulness induction on emotionally valenced mind wandering. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(8), 785–799.
    1. Banks, J. B., Welhaf, M. S., Hood, A. V. B., Boals, A., & Tartar, J. L. (2016). Examining the role of emotional valence of mind wandering: All mind wandering is not equal. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 167–176. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources